Anna Carfora

516 citations
26 papers · 368 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Soil Science top 10%
    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Papers in

Anna Carfora

25 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Anna Carfora
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Toxicology 42
  • Soil Science 68
  • Emergency Medicine 49
  • Biochemistry 22
  • Virology 13
Replace Frederick Smith with:
Frederick Smith United States
J. E. Winch Canada
Muhammad Asghar Hassan China
Charles Lawoko New Zealand
Scott J. Richter United States
Wenjie Gu China
Hiroki Matsuyama Japan
Xiaofeng Zhang China
M. Roy Canada
Maged M. Yassin Palestinian Territory
Anna Carfora relative to Frederick Smith United States Frederick Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Frederick Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Carfora

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Carfora's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Carfora with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Carfora more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Carfora

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Carfora. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Carfora. The network helps show where Anna Carfora may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Carfora, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Carfora Line = papers co-authored together Anna Carfora links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200961
2 200860
3 200744
4 201843
5 202020
6 201517
7 202017
8 201913
9 202012
10 202211
11 20219
12 20229
13
Clinical and Forensic Diagnosis of Very Recent Heroin Intake by 6-acetylmorphine Immunoassay Test and LC-MS/MS Analysis in Urine and Blood.
20158
14 20147
15 20186
16 20226
17 20175
18 20234
19 20224
20 20203

About Anna Carfora

Anna Carfora is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Toxicology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poisoning and overdose treatments (7 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (3 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (42 citations), Soil Science (68 citations), Emergency Medicine (49 citations), Biochemistry (22 citations) and Virology (13 citations). Anna Carfora has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Pietro Campobasso, Simona Castaldi, Renata Borriello, Antonio Fiorentino, Anna Messere, Stefania Papa, F. Miglietta, Alessandro Feola, M. Francesca Cotrufo and A. Fioretto. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Forensic Science International, Toxics, Toxins and Legal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact