Anna B. Berry
Impact in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Music top 5%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 14
- Genetics 10
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 7
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 5
- Co-authors
- Badrinath R. Konety (4 shared papers)Peter R. Carroll (3 shared papers)Kirsten L. Greene (1 shared paper)John D. Pfeifer (4 shared papers)Jared M. Whitson (2 shared papers)Sophia Yohe (2 shared papers)Burton S. Rosner (1 shared paper)Philip A. Fine (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (6 papers)JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics (3 papers)Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (3 papers)JCO Precision Oncology (2 papers)Diagnostic Cytopathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Anna B. Berry
34 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cancer Research 102
- Music 20
- Urology 32
- Oncology 112
- Genetics 111
Countries citing papers authored by Anna B. Berry
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna B. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna B. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna B. Berry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna B. Berry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna B. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna B. Berry. The network helps show where Anna B. Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna B. Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 5 | Diagnostic Utility of the ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ Test in Bladder Cancer. | 2006 | 40 |
| 6 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 3 |
About Anna B. Berry
Anna B. Berry is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Genetics, Oncology, Music and Urology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (14 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (5 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (5 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (5 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (102 citations), Music (20 citations), Urology (32 citations), Oncology (112 citations) and Genetics (111 citations). Anna B. Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Badrinath R. Konety, Peter R. Carroll, Kirsten L. Greene, John D. Pfeifer, Jared M. Whitson, Sophia Yohe, Burton S. Rosner, Philip A. Fine, Mary M. Zutter and Mary V. Relling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, JCO Precision Oncology and Diagnostic Cytopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.