Anna Ambrosini

3.9k citations
81 papers · 2.5k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Ambrosini

77 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Anna Ambrosini
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.9k
  • Neurology 852
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 905
  • Sensory Systems 244
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 658
Replace J Schoenen with:
J Schoenen Belgium
Arnaud Fumal Belgium
Laura Schulte Germany
Nicola Giffin United Kingdom
F. Michael Cutrer United States
Vanessa Kainz United States
Margarita Sánchez del Río Spain
David Kudrow United States
Francesca Puledda United Kingdom
Letizia Maria Cupini Italy
Anna Ambrosini relative to J Schoenen Belgium J Schoenen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
J Schoenen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Ambrosini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Ambrosini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Ambrosini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Ambrosini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Ambrosini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Ambrosini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Ambrosini. The network helps show where Anna Ambrosini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Ambrosini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Ambrosini Line = papers co-authored together Anna Ambrosini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014243
2 2005238
3 2003167
4 2003129
5 2003117
6 2007111
7 200088
8 200376
9 200576
10 201775
11 201775
12 200165
13 200662
14 199962
15 200660
16 199855
17 200145
18
The value of serum CA 125 and association CA 125/CA 19-9 in endometrial carcinoma.
199944
19 200743
20 201342

About Anna Ambrosini

Anna Ambrosini is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (58 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (24 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (12 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (11 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.9k citations), Neurology (852 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (905 citations), Sensory Systems (244 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (658 citations). Anna Ambrosini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jean Schoenen, Francesco Pierelli, Péter Sándor, Gianluca Coppola, Alain Maertens de Noordhout, J Schoenen, Delphine Magis, Judit Áfra, Michel Vandenheede and Fulvio Aloj. Their work appears in journals such as Cephalalgia, The Journal of Headache and Pain, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact