Ann T. Tate

65 total papers · 986 total citations
29 papers, 536 citations indexed

About

Ann T. Tate is a scholar working on Immunology, Insect Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann T. Tate has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 536 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Immunology, 13 papers in Insect Science and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ann T. Tate's work include Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (13 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (11 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers). Ann T. Tate is often cited by papers focused on Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (13 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (11 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers). Ann T. Tate collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Australia. Ann T. Tate's co-authors include Andrea L. Graham, David S. Schneider, Volker H. W. Rudolf, Jeffery P. Demuth, Peter Andolfatto, Poonam Rath, José Henrique M. Oliveira, Katherine Cumnock, Alexander Louie and Maulik Patel and has published in prestigious journals such as Immunity, The American Naturalist and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Ann T. Tate

28 papers receiving 533 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Ann T. Tate	232	219	157	132	90	29	536
Virginia M. Howick	235 1.0×	191 0.9×	246 1.6×	105 0.8×	119 1.3×	14	566
Miguel Moreno‐García	170 0.7×	205 0.9×	270 1.7×	58 0.4×	53 0.6×	37	503
Christian Mitri	219 0.9×	289 1.3×	353 2.2×	66 0.5×	144 1.6×	24	617
Brent W. Harker	144 0.6×	257 1.2×	303 1.9×	73 0.6×	200 2.2×	17	563
A. Tania Bijovsky	119 0.5×	165 0.8×	233 1.5×	54 0.4×	120 1.3×	23	468
Barbara Milutinović	354 1.5×	283 1.3×	91 0.6×	78 0.6×	137 1.5×	11	556
J. C. Hogg	109 0.5×	180 0.8×	309 2.0×	78 0.6×	65 0.7×	10	505
Rhonda Voysey	216 0.9×	204 0.9×	205 1.3×	56 0.4×	89 1.0×	10	501
Leonardo Barbosa Koerich	74 0.3×	168 0.8×	148 0.9×	240 1.8×	166 1.8×	37	561
Yanjie Liu	128 0.6×	106 0.5×	98 0.6×	88 0.7×	196 2.2×	36	546

Countries citing papers authored by Ann T. Tate

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann T. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann T. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann T. Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann T. Tate

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann T. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann T. Tate. The network helps show where Ann T. Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann T. Tate

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann T. Tate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann T. Tate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann T. Tate. Ann T. Tate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact