Ann O. Massion

1.7k citations
13 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 13

Ann O. Massion

13 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ann O. Massion
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 668
  • Clinical Psychology 937
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 202
  • Social Psychology 219
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 72
Replace Jacob Piet with:
Jacob Piet Denmark
Anne E.M. Speckens Netherlands
Ken Fletcher United Kingdom
Brendt P. Parrish United States
Kelsey T. Laird United States
Autumn M. Gallegos United States
Christina A. Metcalf United States
Mark Williams United Kingdom
Mirjam Reijnders Netherlands
Matthew Smout Australia
Ann O. Massion relative to Jacob Piet Denmark Jacob Piet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jacob Piet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann O. Massion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann O. Massion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann O. Massion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann O. Massion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann O. Massion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann O. Massion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann O. Massion. The network helps show where Ann O. Massion may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann O. Massion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann O. Massion Line = papers co-authored together Ann O. Massion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201368
2 2011182
3 2002104
4 200158
5 199716
6
The psychosocial treatments interview for anxiety disorders. A method for assessing psychotherapeutic procedures in anxiety disorders.
199734
7 1996170
8 199552
9 199588
10 1994118
11 199435
12 1993135
13 1993235

About Ann O. Massion

Ann O. Massion is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (668 citations), Clinical Psychology (937 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (202 citations). Ann O. Massion has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin B. Keller, Meredith G. Warshaw, Kimberly A. Yonkers, James R. Hébert, Thomas G. Hurley, Lynn Clemow, Susan Druker, Lisa A. Pratt, Ingrid Dyck and M. Tracie Shea. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Personality Disorders and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026