Ann L. Hume

1.6k total citations
23 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Ann L. Hume is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann L. Hume has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Neurology and 6 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Ann L. Hume's work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers). Ann L. Hume is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers). Ann L. Hume collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Ann L. Hume's co-authors include B.R Cant, Truett Allison, Neil Shaw, William R. Goff, Charles Cresson Wood, Stephen G. Waxman, James A. Judson, R. J. Irwin, Gregory McCarthy and C. C. Wood and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Neurology, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Anesthesiology.

In The Last Decade

Ann L. Hume

23 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ann L. Hume New Zealand 14 444 399 226 208 205 23 1.1k
B.R Cant New Zealand 13 329 0.7× 399 1.0× 258 1.1× 141 0.7× 143 0.7× 16 888
James J. Stockard United States 17 860 1.9× 305 0.8× 135 0.6× 223 1.1× 188 0.9× 30 1.8k
Shigeaki Matsuoka Japan 19 485 1.1× 293 0.7× 116 0.5× 188 0.9× 200 1.0× 73 1.3k
Eric Brunko Belgium 17 337 0.8× 262 0.7× 90 0.4× 104 0.5× 291 1.4× 33 874
Leonard J. Graziani United States 23 307 0.7× 153 0.4× 228 1.0× 131 0.6× 61 0.3× 59 1.7k
Robert P. Cruse United States 19 309 0.7× 189 0.5× 68 0.3× 220 1.1× 72 0.4× 34 1.4k
Esteban A. Fridman United States 17 731 1.6× 317 0.8× 410 1.8× 106 0.5× 324 1.6× 26 1.4k
C. P. Symonds United Kingdom 13 224 0.5× 348 0.9× 196 0.9× 147 0.7× 71 0.3× 25 884
Manuel M. Buitrago United States 15 421 0.9× 393 1.0× 153 0.7× 402 1.9× 229 1.1× 25 1.4k
James G. McMurtry United States 16 547 1.2× 533 1.3× 209 0.9× 402 1.9× 603 2.9× 27 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Ann L. Hume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann L. Hume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann L. Hume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann L. Hume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann L. Hume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann L. Hume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann L. Hume. The network helps show where Ann L. Hume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann L. Hume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann L. Hume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann L. Hume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann L. Hume. Ann L. Hume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hume, Ann L. & Stephen G. Waxman. (1988). Evoked potentials in suspected multiple sclerosis: Diagnostic value and prediction of clinical course. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 83(2-3). 191–210. 54 indexed citations
2.
Hume, Ann L.. (1988). Let me whisper in your ear.. PubMed. 84(16). 39–41. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cant, B.R, Ann L. Hume, James A. Judson, & Neil Shaw. (1986). The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 65(3). 188–195. 104 indexed citations
4.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1986). Central and spinal somatosensory conduction times during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and some observations on the effects of fentanyl and isoflurane anesthesia. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 65(1). 46–58. 30 indexed citations
5.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1985). Central and spinal somatosensory conduction times during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 61(3). S27–S28. 1 indexed citations
6.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1985). RELIABLE AND REPRODUCIBLE NEUROLOGIC INFORMATION USING SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIAL MONITORING DURING HYPOTHERMIC CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS. Anesthesiology. 63(Supplement). A72–A72. 1 indexed citations
7.
Allison, Truett, Ann L. Hume, Charles Cresson Wood, & William R. Goff. (1984). Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 58(1). 14–24. 184 indexed citations
8.
Allison, Truett, C. C. Wood, Gregory McCarthy, Ann L. Hume, & William R. Goff. (1982). Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat: comparative latency analysis.. PubMed. 32. 303–11. 26 indexed citations
9.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1982). Central somatosensory conduction time from 10 to 79 years. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 54(1). 49–54. 57 indexed citations
10.
Allison, Truett & Ann L. Hume. (1981). A comparative analysis of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat. Experimental Neurology. 72(3). 592–611. 128 indexed citations
11.
Hume, Ann L. & B.R Cant. (1981). Central somatosensory conduction after head injury. Annals of Neurology. 10(5). 411–419. 106 indexed citations
12.
Hume, Ann L. & B.R Cant. (1978). Conduction time in central somatosensory pathways in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 45(3). 361–375. 200 indexed citations
13.
Cant, B.R, Ann L. Hume, & Neil Shaw. (1978). Effects of luminence on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 45(4). 496–504. 53 indexed citations
14.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1977). Diagnosis of Hearing Loss in Infancy by Electric Response Audiometry. Archives of Otolaryngology. 103(7). 416–416. 1 indexed citations
15.
Burgess, Richard C., et al.. (1977). Cerebral monitoring by compressed spectral array.. PubMed. 86(601). 521–3. 4 indexed citations
16.
Hume, Ann L.. (1974). Optimal response biases and the slope of ROC curves as a function of signal intensity, signal probability, and relative payoff. Perception & Psychophysics. 16(2). 377–384. 13 indexed citations
17.
Hume, Ann L. & R. J. Irwin. (1974). BIAS FUNCTIONS AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF RATS DISCRIMINATING AUDITORY STIMULI. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 21(2). 285–295. 31 indexed citations
18.
Hume, Ann L.. (1974). Auditory detection and optimal response biases. Perception & Psychophysics. 15(3). 425–433. 12 indexed citations
19.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1959). Management of bile duct strictures with associated portal hypertension.. PubMed. 108(5). 627–30. 10 indexed citations
20.
Hume, Ann L., et al.. (1959). Radiation injury to the sigmoid and rectum.. PubMed. 108(3). 306–12. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026