Ann Heirman

434 citations
35 papers · 176 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ann Heirman

30 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

Ann Heirman
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Religious studies 96
  • Anthropology 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 141
  • Cultural Studies 26
  • Geography, Planning and Development 11
Replace Nick Nesbitt with:
Nick Nesbitt United States
Stephen F. Teiser United States
Jane Geaney United States
Erica Fox Brindley United States
Amnon Shiloah France
Anthony C. Yu United States
Oskar von Hinüber Germany
Jeremy Begbie United Kingdom
Lizabeth Paravisini-Gebert United States
Marvin W. Meyer Poland
Ann Heirman relative to Nick Nesbitt United States Nick Nesbitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Nick Nesbitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Heirman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Heirman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Heirman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Heirman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Heirman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Heirman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Heirman. The network helps show where Ann Heirman may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200114
2 200714
3 201214
4 200213
5
Indian Disciplinary Rules and Their Early Chinese Adepts: A Buddhist Reality
200811
6
Where is the probationer in the Chinese Buddhist nunneries
200810
7
The Discipline in Four Parts: Rules for Nuns according to the Dharmaguptakavinaya, 3 vols.
200210
8 20069
9
Rules for nuns according to the Dharmaguptakavinaya : "The discipline in four parts"
20028
10 20157
11 20117
12
The Chinese Samantapasadika and its School Affiliation.
20047
13 20136
14 19975
15
Gurudharma: an important vinaya rule.
19985
16 20095
17 19995
18 20144
19 20203
20 20103

About Ann Heirman

Ann Heirman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 35 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (19 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (17 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (10 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (3 papers) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (96 citations), Anthropology (42 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations), Cultural Studies (26 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (11 citations). Ann Heirman has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Somalia. Their work appears in journals such as Buddhist Studies Review, Acta Orientalia, T oung Pao, Religions and Numen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact