Citations per year, relative to Ann Fruhling Ann Fruhling (= 1×)
peers
Kevin C. Stagl
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Fruhling
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Fruhling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Fruhling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Fruhling more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Fruhling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Fruhling. The network helps show where Ann Fruhling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Fruhling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Fruhling.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Fruhling based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Fruhling. Ann Fruhling is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Windle, John R., et al.. (2018). Evaluation of Voice Authentication for Patient Health Record Access. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Johnsen, Hege Mari, Mariann Fossum, Pirashanthie Vivekananda‐Schmidt, Ann Fruhling, & Åshild Slettebø. (2016). A Serious Game for Teaching Nursing Students Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making Skills.. PubMed. 225. 905–6.14 indexed citations
6.
Bastola, Dhundy R., et al.. (2016). Forecasting the Spread of Mosquito-Borne Disease using Publicly Accessible Data: A Case Study in Chikungunya.. PubMed. 2016. 431–440.3 indexed citations
7.
Clarke, Martina A., et al.. (2016). A Qualitative Study of User-desired Personal Health Record Functionality: Impact of Age on desired PHR functionality.. AMIA.1 indexed citations
Fruhling, Ann, et al.. (2013). The Chicken and the Pig: User Involvement in Developing Usability Heuristics. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 3263–3270.12 indexed citations
11.
Fruhling, Ann, et al.. (2013). Examining the Success of a Youth Care Management Information System through the Lenses of Novices.2 indexed citations
12.
Fossum, Mariann, et al.. (2012). A Cognitive Walkthrough and Focus Group Study of Nursing Personnel to Improve EHRs Used in Nursing Homes. 13–18.2 indexed citations
13.
Fruhling, Ann, et al.. (2011). Agile Development at ABC – What Went Wrong?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 17(4). 354–360.4 indexed citations
Djamasbi, Soussan, Ann Fruhling, & Eleanor T. Loiacono. (2009). The Influence of Affect, Attitude and Usefulness in the Acceptance of Telemedicine Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 10(1). 4.46 indexed citations
16.
Fruhling, Ann, et al.. (2008). Requirement prioritization decision factors for agile development environments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3298–3308.7 indexed citations
Fruhling, Ann & Jessica Zhang. (2007). An Empirical Study Examining the Usage and Perceived Importance of XP Practices. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 138.3 indexed citations
19.
Fruhling, Ann & Sang M. Lee. (2005). Assessing the Reliability, Validity and Adaptability of PSSUQ. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2231–2239.45 indexed citations
20.
Fruhling, Ann & Lester A. Digman. (2000). THE IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ON BUSINESS-LEVEL STRATEGIES. Journal of electronic commerce research. 1(1). 13–22.44 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.