Ann Allenby
About
In The Last Decade
Ann Allenby
7 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Oncology 225
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 156
- General Health Professions 120
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 109
- Sociology and Political Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Allenby
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Allenby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Allenby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Allenby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Allenby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Allenby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Allenby. The network helps show where Ann Allenby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Allenby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Allenby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Allenby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Allenby. Ann Allenby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 81 | |
| 6 | The Victorian nurse practitioner project. | 4 |
| 7 | 215 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.