Anmol Gupta

51 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Anmol Gupta
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 115
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 42
  • Surgery 167
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 56
Replace Hüseyin Cengiz with:
Hüseyin Cengiz Türkiye
D.S. Chadha India
Ahmed K. Mortagy Egypt
Ellina Lytvyak Canada
Jennifer Hislop United Kingdom
Jung Hyun Lee South Korea
Saliu Balogun Australia
Scott S. Short United States
Tania Milne New Zealand
Ana Patricia Navarrete‐Reyes Mexico
Anmol Gupta relative to Hüseyin Cengiz Türkiye Hüseyin Cengiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Hüseyin Cengiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anmol Gupta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anmol Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anmol Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anmol Gupta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anmol Gupta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anmol Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anmol Gupta. The network helps show where Anmol Gupta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anmol Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anmol Gupta Line = papers co-authored together Anmol Gupta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202052
2 199938
3 201532
4 201931
5 202125
6 201922
7 201920
8 201619
9 201818
10 201218
11 202017
12 201415
13 201512
14
Combating Iron Deficiency Anemia among School Going Adolescent Girls in a Hilly State of North India: Effectiveness of Intermittent Versus Daily Administration of Iron Folic Acid Tablets.
20149
15 20207
16 20147
17 20186
18 20186
19 20206
20 19965

About Anmol Gupta

Anmol Gupta is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 63 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (115 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (42 citations), Surgery (167 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (56 citations). Anmol Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph H. Schwab, Stuart H. Hershman, Anita Thakur, Thomas Cha, Harold A. Fogel, Christopher M. Bono, Deepak Sharma, Daniel G. Tobert, Andrew C. Hecht and Afshin E. Razi. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Global Spine Journal, JAMA Network Open, Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication and Journal of Spine Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact