Daniel G. Tobert

81 papers receiving 993 citations

Peers

Daniel G. Tobert
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Health Informatics 92
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 360
  • Surgery 696
  • Rehabilitation 56
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 64
Replace Paul T. Ogink with:
Paul T. Ogink United States
Harold A. Fogel United States
Olivier Q. Groot United States
Amy M. Cizik United States
Hai Le United States
Afshin E. Razi United States
Oke Anakwenze United States
Kevin Wang United States
Kim L. Stearns United States
Kevin J. McGuire United States
Daniel G. Tobert relative to Paul T. Ogink United States Paul T. Ogink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul T. Ogink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Tobert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Tobert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Tobert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Tobert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Tobert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Tobert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Tobert. The network helps show where Daniel G. Tobert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Tobert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Tobert Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Tobert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201765
2 201958
3 201953
4 202052
5 202051
6 201646
7 202042
8 202040
9 202033
10 202227
11 202126
12 201826
13 202125
14 202123
15 202023
16 201721
17 202219
18 202219
19 202218
20 202017

About Daniel G. Tobert

Daniel G. Tobert is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (36 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (30 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (29 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (9 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (9 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (92 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (360 citations), Surgery (696 citations), Rehabilitation (56 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (64 citations). Daniel G. Tobert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph H. Schwab, Christopher M. Bono, Aditya V. Karhade, Harold A. Fogel, Stuart H. Hershman, Mitchel B. Harris, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, D. Thomas, James D. Kang and Olivier Q. Groot. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Spine, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026