Anja Bieber

1.3k citations
35 papers · 683 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anja Bieber

30 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers

Anja Bieber
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 234
  • General Health Professions 173
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Clinical Psychology 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
Replace Katharina Heimerl with:
Katharina Heimerl Austria
Marie Thompson Australia
Lindsay Peterson United States
Tzipi Hornik‐Lurie Israel
Jan Delepeleire Belgium
Qiuping Zhou United States
Patrick J. McCabe United States
Melissa E. Smith United States
Conny Karnes United States
Bjørg Th. Landmark Norway
Anja Bieber relative to Katharina Heimerl Austria Katharina Heimerl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Katharina Heimerl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anja Bieber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anja Bieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anja Bieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anja Bieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anja Bieber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anja Bieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anja Bieber. The network helps show where Anja Bieber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anja Bieber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anja Bieber Line = papers co-authored together Anja Bieber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018174
2 201985
3 201760
4 201641
5 201639
6 201837
7 201923
8 202022
9 202122
10 201722
11 201920
12 202017
13 201915
14 202314
15 201912
16 202012
17 202110
18 20229
19 20188
20 20218

About Anja Bieber

Anja Bieber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (234 citations), General Health Professions (173 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), Clinical Psychology (58 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (106 citations). Anja Bieber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Meyer, Astrid Stephan, Kate Irving, Manuel Gonçalves‐Pereira, Orazio Zanetti, Frans R.J. Verhey, Bob Woods, Elisa Portolani, Louise Hopper and Maria J. Marques. Their work appears in journals such as Aging & Mental Health, BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Health & Social Care in the Community.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact