Anita Cremers

1.1k total citations
29 papers, 511 citations indexed

About

Anita Cremers is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anita Cremers has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 511 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anita Cremers's work include Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), AI in Service Interactions (5 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers). Anita Cremers is often cited by papers focused on Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), AI in Service Interactions (5 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers). Anita Cremers collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Norway and Belgium. Anita Cremers's co-authors include Robbert‐Jan Beun, Mark A. Neerincx, Jasper van der Waa, Paul Piwek, José H. Kerstholt, Tibor Bosse, David A. van Leeuwen, Khiet P. Truong, Harriët Wittink and Judith M. Kessens and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Artificial Intelligence and Journal of Pragmatics.

In The Last Decade

Anita Cremers

29 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anita Cremers Netherlands 11 290 102 71 49 49 29 511
Zion Mengesha United States 4 259 0.9× 42 0.4× 35 0.5× 87 1.8× 6 0.1× 7 441
Young Hoan Cho South Korea 13 129 0.4× 55 0.5× 32 0.5× 32 0.7× 307 6.3× 50 945
Austin Pack United States 12 279 1.0× 45 0.4× 37 0.5× 33 0.7× 145 3.0× 21 761
Isaac Johnson United States 13 193 0.7× 41 0.4× 29 0.4× 50 1.0× 9 0.2× 25 613
Alex Barrett United States 9 199 0.7× 40 0.4× 31 0.4× 23 0.5× 136 2.8× 26 626
Leigh Clark United Kingdom 14 491 1.7× 46 0.5× 24 0.3× 49 1.0× 29 0.6× 38 713
Katy Ilonka Gero United States 11 225 0.8× 36 0.4× 8 0.1× 54 1.1× 29 0.6× 22 438
Donggil Song United States 15 140 0.5× 31 0.3× 15 0.2× 16 0.3× 235 4.8× 35 723
Saman Ebadi Iran 19 153 0.5× 41 0.4× 221 3.1× 21 0.4× 488 10.0× 91 1.3k
Rose Luckin United Kingdom 15 150 0.5× 20 0.2× 14 0.2× 21 0.4× 224 4.6× 49 698

Countries citing papers authored by Anita Cremers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anita Cremers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anita Cremers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anita Cremers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anita Cremers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anita Cremers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anita Cremers. The network helps show where Anita Cremers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anita Cremers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anita Cremers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anita Cremers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anita Cremers. Anita Cremers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cremers, Anita, et al.. (2024). The effect of preference elicitation methods on the user experience in conversational recommender systems. Computer Speech & Language. 89. 101696–101696. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cremers, Anita, et al.. (2024). An experimental comparison of participants’ experience in face-to-face, video, and virtual reality meetings. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 2 indexed citations
3.
Theune, Mariët, et al.. (2022). An embodied conversational agent coach to support societal participation learning by low-literate users. Universal Access in the Information Society. 22(4). 1215–1241. 7 indexed citations
4.
Donker, Stella F., et al.. (2020). Using scaffolding to formalize digital coach support for low-literate learners. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 31(2). 183–223. 3 indexed citations
5.
Bosse, Tibor, et al.. (2017). A Digital Coach That Provides Affective and Social Learning Support to Low-Literate Learners. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 11(1). 67–80. 18 indexed citations
6.
Verhoeven, Fenne, et al.. (2016). Mobiles for mobility: Participatory design of a ‘Happy walker’ that stimulates mobility among older people. Gerontechnology. 15(1). 8 indexed citations
7.
Smets, Nanja, et al.. (2016). Requirements for a virtual environment to support the social participation education of low-literates. Universal Access in the Information Society. 16(3). 681–698. 10 indexed citations
8.
Cremers, Anita, et al.. (2016). Sociale veiligheid voor ouderen met ICT. TNO Repository. 41(2). 5. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cremers, Anita, et al.. (2015). Deriving guidelines for designing interactive questionnaires for low-literate persons: development of a health assessment questionnaire. Universal Access in the Information Society. 16(1). 161–172. 10 indexed citations
10.
Span, Marijke, Jan Jukema, Marike Hettinga, et al.. (2014). Towards an Interactive Web Tool That Supports Shared Decision Making in Dementia : Identifying User Requirements. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 6. 338–349. 10 indexed citations
11.
Cremers, Anita, et al.. (2014). Does playing the serious game B-SaFe! make citizens more aware of man-made and natural risks in their environment?. Journal of Risk Research. 18(10). 1280–1292. 15 indexed citations
12.
Cremers, Anita, et al.. (2014). 'Include', a Toolbox of User Research for Inclusive Design. TNO Repository. 113–121. 1 indexed citations
13.
Steen, Marc, et al.. (2013). Using interactive model simulations in co-design: An experiment in urban design. CoDesign. 9(1). 2–16. 6 indexed citations
14.
Sassen, Barbara, Gerjo Kok, Ilse Mesters, et al.. (2012). A Web-Based Intervention for Health Professionals and Patients to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk Attributable to Physical Inactivity: Development Process. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(2). e21–e21. 10 indexed citations
15.
Kerstholt, José H., et al.. (2009). Construction of Health Preferences: A Comparison of Direct Value Assessment and Personal Narratives. Medical Decision Making. 29(4). 513–520. 13 indexed citations
16.
Neerincx, Mark A., Anita Cremers, Judith M. Kessens, David A. van Leeuwen, & Khiet P. Truong. (2008). Attuning speech-enabled interfaces to user and context for inclusive design: technology, methodology and practice. Universal Access in the Information Society. 8(2). 109–122. 17 indexed citations
17.
Piwek, Paul, Robbert‐Jan Beun, & Anita Cremers. (2007). ‘Proximal’ and ‘distal’ in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics. 40(4). 694–718. 71 indexed citations
18.
Beun, Robbert‐Jan & Anita Cremers. (2001). Multimodal reference to objects: An empirical approach. Lecture notes in computer science. 64–86. 5 indexed citations
19.
Beun, Robbert‐Jan & Anita Cremers. (1998). Object reference in a shared domain of conversation. Pragmatics & Cognition. 6(1-2). 121–152. 76 indexed citations
20.
Cremers, Anita. (1996). Reference to objects : an empirically based study of task-oriented dialogues. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zion Mengesha Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Young Hoan Cho Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Austin Pack Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Isaac Johnson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alex Barrett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leigh Clark Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katy Ilonka Gero Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Donggil Song Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Saman Ebadi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rose Luckin
Rankless by CCL
2026