Angus Forbes

5.3k citations
161 papers · 3.6k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Angus Forbes

155 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Angus Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 827
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 266
  • Speech and Hearing 203
  • Pharmacy 134
  • General Health Professions 517
Replace Helen Pattison with:
Helen Pattison United Kingdom
Jennifer M. Jones Canada
Danielle Hessler United States
Ora L. Strickland United States
Jo Hart United Kingdom
Stewart M. Dunn Australia
Peymané Adab United Kingdom
Heather Gage United Kingdom
Mostafa A. Abolfotouh Saudi Arabia
Noelle Robertson United Kingdom
Angus Forbes relative to Helen Pattison United Kingdom Helen Pattison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Helen Pattison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Angus Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angus Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angus Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angus Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angus Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angus Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angus Forbes. The network helps show where Angus Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Angus Forbes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Angus Forbes Line = papers co-authored together Angus Forbes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 161 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012189
2 2004148
3 2018141
4 2006121
5 2013117
6 2011114
7 200195
8 201891
9 201485
10 200780
11
Social capital for health: issues of definition, measurement and links to health
200477
12 200276
13 200771
14 201471
15 202070
16 200467
17 200765
18 201565
19 201863
20 200762

About Angus Forbes

Angus Forbes is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, having authored 161 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (38 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (25 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (20 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (19 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (827 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (266 citations), Speech and Hearing (203 citations), Pharmacy (134 citations) and General Health Professions (517 citations). Angus Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Griffiths, Alison While, Lucia Mathes, Khalida Ismail, Steven P. Wainwright, Alan J. Sinclair, Freda Mold, Henrietta Mulnier, Roxanne Crosby‐Nwaobi and Sobha Sivaprasad. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetic Medicine, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact