Angus D. Macleod
- Neurology top 2%
- Physiology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Carl CounsellKate TaylorNatalie IvesRebecca StoweJodi Maple‐GrødemRobert CaslakeOle‐Bjørn TysnesGuido Alves
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (32 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (17 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologyCellular and Molecular NeurosciencePhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Journals
- The LancetBrainNeurology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwaySweden
In The Last Decade
Angus D. Macleod
36 papers receiving 890 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Neurology 700
- Physiology 167
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
- Psychiatry and Mental health 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 93
Countries citing papers authored by Angus D. Macleod
This map shows the geographic impact of Angus D. Macleod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angus D. Macleod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angus D. Macleod more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angus D. Macleod
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angus D. Macleod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angus D. Macleod. The network helps show where Angus D. Macleod may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angus D. Macleod
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angus D. Macleod. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angus D. Macleod based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angus D. Macleod. Angus D. Macleod is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 71 | |
| 8 | Lack of Association Between GBA Mutations and Motor Complications in European and American Parkinson's Disease Cohorts | 5 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 95 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Angus D. Macleod
Angus D. Macleod is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (32 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (17 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (700 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (156 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (36 citations). Angus D. Macleod has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Carl Counsell, Kate Taylor, Natalie Ives, Rebecca Stowe, Jodi Maple‐Grødem, Robert Caslake, Ole‐Bjørn Tysnes, Guido Alves, Neil Scott and Ingvild Dalen. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Brain and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.