Angelique Richardson
- History top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers)Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers)Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEthnic and Racial StudiesTextual Practice
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Angelique Richardson
17 papers receiving 105 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- History 82
- Literature and Literary Theory 69
- Sociology and Political Science 66
- Political Science and International Relations 20
- Clinical Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Angelique Richardson
This map shows the geographic impact of Angelique Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelique Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelique Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angelique Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelique Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelique Richardson. The network helps show where Angelique Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angelique Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angelique Richardson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angelique Richardson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angelique Richardson. Angelique Richardson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Women Who Did: Stories by Men and Women, 1890-1914 | 5 |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | The New Woman in Fiction and in Fact: Fin-de-Siécle Feminisms | 35 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Angelique Richardson
Angelique Richardson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers) and Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (82 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (69 citations) and General Psychology (6 citations). Angelique Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris Willis, John C. Waller, Tim D. Spector, I. Karen Temple, Peter J. Garratt and Deborah Mackay. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ethnic and Racial Studies and Textual Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.