Angela Woollacott
- History top 0.5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 7
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Security, and Conflict 5
-
- Australian History and Society 22
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 10
- Canadian Identity and History 2
- Anthropology top 5%
-
- World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact 4
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 3
-
- Labor Movements and Unions 2
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)Signs (1 paper)Women s Studies International Forum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Angela Woollacott
42 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- History 206
- Gender Studies 114
- Sociology and Political Science 420
- Anthropology 77
- Political Science and International Relations 142
Countries citing papers authored by Angela Woollacott
This map shows the geographic impact of Angela Woollacott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angela Woollacott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angela Woollacott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angela Woollacott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angela Woollacott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angela Woollacott. The network helps show where Angela Woollacott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Angela Woollacott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 4 | Manly authority, employing non-white labour, and frontier violence 1830s-1860s | 2013 | 2 |
| 5 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 8 | Russel Ward, Frontier Violence and Australian Historiography | 2008 | 1 |
| 9 | A Feminist History of Violence: History as a Weapon of Liberation? | 2007 | 1 |
| 10 | Feminisms and Internationalism | 1999 | 39 |
| 11 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 16 | Gendering War Talk // Review | 1994 | 1 |
| 17 | 1993 | 119 | |
| 18 | Deborah Dwork — War is Good for Babies and Other Young Children: A History of the infant and Child Welfare Movement in England 1898-1918. | 1988 | 2 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 1 |
About Angela Woollacott
Angela Woollacott is a scholar working on History, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (22 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (10 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (7 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (5 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (206 citations), Gender Studies (114 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (420 citations). Angela Woollacott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Donna J. Guy, Mrinalini Sinha, Desley Deacon and Miriam Cooke. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Signs and Women s Studies International Forum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.