Ángel M. Candela-Toha
- Nephrology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Co-authors
- Víctor AbrairaTomasa CentellaJosé Manuel del ReyAlfonso MurielFernando LiañoJavier ZamoraAna B. SerranoDavid Pestaña
- Topics
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers)Acute Kidney Injury Research (7 papers)Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyBMJ Open
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ángel M. Candela-Toha
13 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Nephrology 89
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 73
- Surgery 42
- Emergency Medicine 42
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
Countries citing papers authored by Ángel M. Candela-Toha
This map shows the geographic impact of Ángel M. Candela-Toha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ángel M. Candela-Toha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ángel M. Candela-Toha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ángel M. Candela-Toha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ángel M. Candela-Toha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ángel M. Candela-Toha. The network helps show where Ángel M. Candela-Toha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ángel M. Candela-Toha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ángel M. Candela-Toha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ángel M. Candela-Toha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ángel M. Candela-Toha. Ángel M. Candela-Toha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 64 |
About Ángel M. Candela-Toha
Ángel M. Candela-Toha is a scholar working on Nephrology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 132 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (7 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (89 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations) and Emergency Medicine (42 citations). Ángel M. Candela-Toha has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Víctor Abraira, Tomasa Centella, José Manuel del Rey, Alfonso Muriel, Fernando Liaño, Javier Zamora, Ana B. Serrano, David Pestaña, María Gómez Rojo and Teresa Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.