Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
‘Left behind places’: a geographical etymology
2023131 citationsVincent Béal, Rachel S. Franklin et al.Regional Studiesprofile →
Rethinking ‘left-behind’ places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent
202428 citationsDanny MacKinnon, Vincent Béal et al.Regional Studiesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Leibert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Leibert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Leibert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Leibert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Leibert. The network helps show where Tim Leibert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Leibert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Leibert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Leibert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Leibert. Tim Leibert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
MacKinnon, Danny, Vincent Béal, & Tim Leibert. (2024). Rethinking ‘left-behind’ places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent. Regional Studies. 58(6). 1161–1166.28 indexed citations breakdown →
Leibert, Tim, et al.. (2019). Innerstädtische Umzugsmuster ausländischer Staatsangehöriger in Leipzig: Ankunftsquartiere in Ostdeutschland?. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 32(2). 60–68.1 indexed citations
13.
Leibert, Tim, et al.. (2017). Experimentiert, diskutiert, visualisiert: die IfL Forschungswerkstätten #1 und #2 im Rückblick. 34. 76.1 indexed citations
Leibert, Tim. (2017). Expertenwissen für Bevölkerungsvorausberechnungen - das Beispiel Leipzig. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 30(2). 10–14.2 indexed citations
Wiest, Karin, et al.. (2014). Dealing with female brain-drain in rural Europe: results from the CENTRAL EUROPE project WOMEN. 26. 113.2 indexed citations
Nowicki, Peter, Hans van Meijl, Martin Banse, et al.. (2007). Scenar 2020 : scenario study on agriculture and the rural world. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.65 indexed citations
20.
Leibert, Tim, et al.. (2006). Auswirkungen des demographischen Wandels auf den öffentlichen Personennahverkehr in der Region Schwarzwald-Baar-Heuberg : Abschlußbericht. MADOC (University of Mannheim).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.