Andrew Wernick
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Marketing top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Topics
- Legal and Social Philosophy (2 papers)Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper)French Literature and Criticism (1 paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe Canadian Journal of SociologyTheory Culture & Society
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Andrew Wernick
18 papers receiving 428 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Sociology and Political Science 258
- Gender Studies 129
- Communication 84
- Marketing 71
- Political Science and International Relations 62
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Wernick
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Wernick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Wernick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Wernick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Wernick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Wernick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Wernick. The network helps show where Andrew Wernick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Wernick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Wernick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Wernick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Wernick. Andrew Wernick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shadow of Spirit: Postmodernism and Religion | 5 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Bataille's Columbine: The Sacred Space Of Hate | 1 |
| 11 | 90 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 267 | |
| 14 | 66 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | The Post-Innisian Significance of Innis | 5 |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | De Sade and the Dead-End of Rationalism | 1 |
| 19 | In Defence of Intellectual Culture | 1 |
| 20 | Critical Theory and Practice: A Response to Ben Agger | 1 |
About Andrew Wernick
Andrew Wernick is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 20 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal and Social Philosophy (2 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper) and French Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations), Gender Studies (129 citations) and Communication (84 citations). Andrew Wernick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Arthur W. Frank, Brian Longhurst, Neena L. Chappell and Mike Featherstone. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Canadian Journal of Sociology and Theory Culture & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.