Andrew Wernick

1.7k total citations
20 papers, 577 citations indexed

About

Andrew Wernick is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Wernick has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 577 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Andrew Wernick's work include Legal and Social Philosophy (2 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper) and French Literature and Criticism (1 paper). Andrew Wernick is often cited by papers focused on Legal and Social Philosophy (2 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper) and French Literature and Criticism (1 paper). Andrew Wernick collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Andrew Wernick's co-authors include Arthur W. Frank, Brian Longhurst, Neena L. Chappell and Mike Featherstone and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Canadian Journal of Sociology and Theory Culture & Society.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Wernick

18 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Andrew Wernick
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Sociology and Political Science 258
  • Gender Studies 129
  • Communication 84
  • Marketing 71
  • Political Science and International Relations 62
Mica Nava United Kingdom
Marjorie Ferguson United States
Emily Keightley United Kingdom
David Nasaw United States
Shaun Moores United Kingdom
Richard Ohmann United States
Radhika Parameswaran United States
Constantine V. Nakassis United States
Purnima Mankekar United States
Frank Mort United Kingdom
Mica Nava United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Andrew Wernick
Andrew Wernick · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Andrew Wernick
Andrew Wernick · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Wernick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Wernick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Wernick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Wernick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Wernick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Wernick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Wernick. The network helps show where Andrew Wernick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Wernick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Wernick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Wernick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Wernick. Andrew Wernick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Shadow of Spirit: Postmodernism and Religion
5
2 5
3 8
4 15
5 2
6 40
7 30
8 6
9 0
10
Bataille's Columbine: The Sacred Space Of Hate
1
11 90
12 10
13 267
14 66
15 4
16
The Post-Innisian Significance of Innis
5
17 20
18
De Sade and the Dead-End of Rationalism
1
19
In Defence of Intellectual Culture
1
20
Critical Theory and Practice: A Response to Ben Agger
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026