Andrew W. Kahrl
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Finance
- General Health Professions
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Topics
- American Environmental and Regional History (10 papers)American History and Culture (6 papers)Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of American HistoryThe Journal of Southern History
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew W. Kahrl
21 papers receiving 157 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 110
- Economics and Econometrics 36
- Finance 23
- General Health Professions 22
- Urban Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew W. Kahrl
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew W. Kahrl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew W. Kahrl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew W. Kahrl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew W. Kahrl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew W. Kahrl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew W. Kahrl. The network helps show where Andrew W. Kahrl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew W. Kahrl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew W. Kahrl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew W. Kahrl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew W. Kahrl. Andrew W. Kahrl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Unconscionable: Tax Delinquency Sales as a Form of Dignity Taking | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | The Land Was Ours | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | The "Negro Park" Question" Land, Labor, and Leisure in Pitt County, North Carolina, 1920-1930 | 2 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | The Land Was Ours: How Black Beaches Became White Wealth in the Coastal South | 9 |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Andrew W. Kahrl
Andrew W. Kahrl is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing and Finance, having authored 22 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (10 papers), American History and Culture (6 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (21 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (14 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (110 citations). Andrew W. Kahrl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Bloom, Sara González, W. I. Jenkins, R J Shaw and John Foot. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of American History and The Journal of Southern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.