Andrew T. Fields

30 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Andrew T. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 430
  • Aquatic Science 220
  • Insect Science 186
  • Aging 20
  • Genetics 240
Replace Scott A. Pavey with:
Scott A. Pavey Canada
M. Emília Santos United Kingdom
Lingbo Ma China
Nicholas Stiffler United States
Robert Peuß United States
Andrés Pérez‐Figueroa Spain
Jong S. Leong Canada
Carla De Giorgi Italy
Mats E. Pettersson Sweden
Zhaoxia Cui China
Andrew T. Fields relative to Scott A. Pavey Canada Scott A. Pavey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Scott A. Pavey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew T. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew T. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew T. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew T. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew T. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew T. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew T. Fields. The network helps show where Andrew T. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew T. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew T. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Andrew T. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011212
2 201592
3 201286
4 201786
5 199385
6 201482
7 201865
8 201758
9 201532
10 202031
11 201628
12 201324
13
The land Mollusca of Dominica (Lesser Antilles), with notes on some enigmatic or rare species
200920
14 202018
15 202117
16 200417
17 202017
18 202016
19 200412
20 202311

About Andrew T. Fields

Andrew T. Fields is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Genetics and Insect Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (16 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (14 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (430 citations), Aquatic Science (220 citations), Insect Science (186 citations), Aging (20 citations) and Genetics (240 citations). Andrew T. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Kevin A. Feldheim, Demian D. Chapman, Aaron M. Tarone, Andrew D. Stewart, Stanley K. H. Shea, William R. Rice, Thomas L. Turner, Debra L. Abercrombie, Diego Cardeñosa and Elizabeth A. Babcock. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Ecology and Evolution, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Animal Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026