Mitchell J. H. Lum

14 papers receiving 633 citations

Peers

Mitchell J. H. Lum
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Biomedical Engineering 451
  • Surgery 319
  • Control and Systems Engineering 225
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 180
  • Mechanical Engineering 134
Replace H. Hawkeye King with:
H. Hawkeye King United States
Gary S. Guthart United States
Diana C. W. Friedman United States
M. Ghodoussi United States
Tolga G. Goktekin United States
Laurent Grisoni France
Giuseppe Andrea Fontanelli Italy
Mohsen Moradi Dalvand Australia
Omid Mohareri Canada
Mitchell J. H. Lum relative to H. Hawkeye King United States H. Hawkeye King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Hawkeye King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell J. H. Lum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell J. H. Lum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell J. H. Lum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell J. H. Lum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell J. H. Lum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell J. H. Lum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell J. H. Lum. The network helps show where Mitchell J. H. Lum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell J. H. Lum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell J. H. Lum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell J. H. Lum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell J. H. Lum. Mitchell J. H. Lum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Preliminary protocol for interoperable telesurgery
23
2 56
3 16
4 188
5 18
6
Objective assessment of telesurgical robot systems: Telerobotic FLS.
17
7 20
8 17
9
Telesurgery via Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with a field deployable surgical robot.
34
10 135
11
Hybrid analysis of a spherical mechanism for a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) robot--design concepts for multiple optimizations.
4
12 48
13
Control system architecture for a minimally invasive surgical robot.
6
14 73

About Mitchell J. H. Lum

Mitchell J. H. Lum is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 14 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soft Robotics and Applications (13 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (451 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (225 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (180 citations). Mitchell J. H. Lum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Blake Hannaford, Mika Sinanan, Jacob Rosén, H. Hawkeye King, Diana C. W. Friedman, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Jennifer E. Rosen, Rainer Leuschke, Thomas S. Lendvay and Andrew S. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, The International Journal of Robotics Research and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026