Andrew Moore

1.1k total citations
9 papers, 792 citations indexed

About

Andrew Moore is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Moore has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 792 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Moore's work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Andrew Moore is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Andrew Moore collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Andrew Moore's co-authors include Henry McQuay, David J. Gavaghan, O. Moore, Sebastian Straube, Dawn Carroll, Henry J McQuay, Sheena Derry, Jasmin Hutchinson, Leighton Jones and Paul D’Alton and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, International Journal of Psychophysiology and Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Moore

9 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Andrew Moore

PHARM

SURGE

APM

PHYSI

CN

Winston C. V. Parris United States

Ann‐Mari Estlander Finland

Frank Huygen Netherlands

Michel Y. Dubois United States

Norbert Grießinger Germany

B. Hastie United States

Joan Hester United Kingdom

Steven Hanling United States

Alex Cahana United States

Jinrun Gao United States

Winston C. V. Parris United States

Andrew Moore

362 ×1.1

PHARM

209 ×0.7

SURGE

287 ×1.0

APM

283 ×1.5

PHYSI

176 ×1.2

CN

Citations per year, relative to Andrew Moore Andrew Moore (= 1×) peers Winston C. V. Parris

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Moore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Moore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Moore. The network helps show where Andrew Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Moore. Andrew Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Hahn‐Holbrook, Jennifer, et al.. (2018). Where is the love? A double-blind, randomized study of the effects of intranasal oxytocin on stress regulation and aggression. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 136. 15–21. 15 indexed citations

2.

Cranmer, Gregory A., et al.. (2018). High School Athletes’ Reports of Confirmation as a Function of Starting Status and Leader–Member Exchange. Communication & Sport. 7(4). 510–528. 6 indexed citations

3.

Hutchinson, Jasmin, et al.. (2017). The influence of self-selected music on affect-regulated exercise intensity and remembered pleasure during treadmill running.. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology. 7(1). 80–92. 85 indexed citations

4.

Moore, Andrew, Sebastian Straube, Christopher Eccleston, et al.. (2011). Estimate at your peril: Imputation methods for patient withdrawal can bias efficacy outcomes in chronic pain trials using responder analyses. Pain. 153(2). 265–268. 122 indexed citations

5.

Moore, Andrew, et al.. (2011). Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta-analysis of acute pain trials: Examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction. Pain. 152(5). 982–989. 125 indexed citations

6.

Barden, Jodie, Jayne Edwards, Lorna Mason, Henry J McQuay, & Andrew Moore. (2004). Outcomes in acute pain trials: systematic review of what was reported?. Pain. 109(3). 351–356. 37 indexed citations

7.

Moore, Andrew, O. Moore, Henry McQuay, & David J. Gavaghan. (1997). Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain. 69(3). 311–315. 167 indexed citations

8.

Moore, Andrew, Henry McQuay, & David J. Gavaghan. (1997). Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: verification from independent data. Pain. 69(1). 127–130. 132 indexed citations

9.

McQuay, Henry, Dawn Carroll, & Andrew Moore. (1996). Variation in the placebo effect in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: all is as blind as it seems. Pain. 64(2). 331–335. 103 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact