Henry McQuay

4.3k total citations
36 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Henry McQuay is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Henry McQuay has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 10 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Henry McQuay's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (12 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers). Henry McQuay is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (12 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers). Henry McQuay collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Finland. Henry McQuay's co-authors include Andrew Moore, David J. Gavaghan, Dawn Carroll, Andrew Moore, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Andrew Moore, Rae Frances Bell, Christopher Eccleston and Gavril W. Pasternak and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Annals of Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Henry McQuay

35 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Henry McQuay United Kingdom 21 1.3k 1.1k 934 811 604 36 3.0k
Rae Frances Bell Norway 27 1.3k 1.0× 793 0.7× 1.0k 1.1× 1.1k 1.3× 478 0.8× 50 3.1k
M. Zenz Germany 34 2.3k 1.8× 1.0k 0.9× 1.0k 1.1× 1.2k 1.5× 678 1.1× 227 4.6k
HJ McQuay United Kingdom 20 841 0.6× 805 0.7× 501 0.5× 816 1.0× 366 0.6× 41 2.3k
Bart Morlion Belgium 34 1.2k 0.9× 1.0k 0.9× 1.5k 1.6× 1.4k 1.7× 649 1.1× 109 4.4k
Sheena Derry United Kingdom 32 995 0.8× 908 0.8× 1.7k 1.8× 1.3k 1.5× 337 0.6× 65 3.9k
Flaminia Coluzzi Italy 29 879 0.7× 921 0.8× 551 0.6× 693 0.9× 434 0.7× 128 3.0k
Dominic Aldington United Kingdom 28 926 0.7× 668 0.6× 1.2k 1.3× 1.3k 1.6× 431 0.7× 62 3.2k
Noor M. Gajraj United States 27 920 0.7× 817 0.7× 671 0.7× 549 0.7× 229 0.4× 69 2.3k
Paul J. Christo United States 30 1.0k 0.8× 899 0.8× 953 1.0× 617 0.8× 285 0.5× 87 2.9k
R. Sabatowski Germany 38 1.9k 1.5× 916 0.8× 1.3k 1.3× 1.3k 1.7× 1.0k 1.7× 164 4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Henry McQuay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henry McQuay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry McQuay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry McQuay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henry McQuay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry McQuay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry McQuay. The network helps show where Henry McQuay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henry McQuay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henry McQuay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henry McQuay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henry McQuay. Henry McQuay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kaasa, Stein, Giovanni Apolone, Pål Klepstad, et al.. (2011). Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification—the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 1(3). 281–287. 48 indexed citations
2.
Moore, Andrew, Sebastian Straube, Christopher Eccleston, et al.. (2011). Estimate at your peril: Imputation methods for patient withdrawal can bias efficacy outcomes in chronic pain trials using responder analyses. Pain. 153(2). 265–268. 122 indexed citations
3.
Moore, R Andrew, Christopher Eccleston, Sheena Derry, et al.. (2010). “Evidence” in chronic pain – establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews. Pain. 150(3). 386–389. 275 indexed citations
4.
McQuay, Henry. (2008). Help and hope at the bottom of the pile. BMJ. 336(7650). 954.1–955. 22 indexed citations
5.
Schweinhardt, Petra, Chris Glynn, J.C. Brooks, et al.. (2006). An fMRI study of cerebral processing of brush-evoked allodynia in neuropathic pain patients. NeuroImage. 32(1). 256–265. 150 indexed citations
6.
McQuay, Henry. (2004). Handbook of Pain Relief in Older Adults—An Evidence‐Based Approach. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 59(2). 262–262. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mason, Lorna, et al.. (2004). Single dose oral naproxen and naproxen sodium for acute postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD004234–CD004234. 35 indexed citations
8.
Cherny, Nathan I., Carla Ripamonti, José Pereira, et al.. (2001). Strategies to Manage the Adverse Effects of Oral Morphine: An Evidence-Based Report. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 19(9). 2542–2554. 458 indexed citations
9.
McQuay, Henry. (1999). Opioids in pain management. The Lancet. 353(9171). 2229–2232. 287 indexed citations
10.
Carroll, Dawn, et al.. (1997). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in labour pain: a systematic review. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 104(2). 169–175. 87 indexed citations
11.
Moore, Andrew, O. Moore, Henry McQuay, & David J. Gavaghan. (1997). Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain. 69(3). 311–315. 167 indexed citations
12.
Moore, Andrew, Henry McQuay, & David J. Gavaghan. (1997). Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: verification from independent data. Pain. 69(1). 127–130. 132 indexed citations
13.
Jadad, Alejandro R., Dawn Carroll, Andrew Moore, & Henry McQuay. (1996). Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research 1. Pain. 66(2). 239–246. 182 indexed citations
14.
McQuay, Henry, Dawn Carroll, & Andrew Moore. (1996). Variation in the placebo effect in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: all is as blind as it seems. Pain. 64(2). 331–335. 103 indexed citations
15.
Moore, Andrew, Henry McQuay, & David J. Gavaghan. (1996). Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics. Pain. 66(2). 229–237. 186 indexed citations
16.
Moore, Andrew, et al.. (1992). Bandolier’s Little Book of Pain. 76 indexed citations
17.
McQuay, Henry. (1987). Central Analgesics. Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum. 38. 41–43. 1 indexed citations
18.
Moore, Andrew, Henry McQuay, Peter J. Teddy, et al.. (1984). Plasma Morphine Concentrations and Analgesic Effects of Lumbar Extradural Morphine and Heroin. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 63(7). 629???634–629???634. 20 indexed citations
19.
Moore, Andrew, John W. Sear, Dene Baldwin, et al.. (1984). Morphine kinetics during and after renal transplantation. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 35(5). 641–645. 40 indexed citations
20.
McQuay, Henry, et al.. (1982). A Model for Comparison of Local Anesthetics in Man. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 61(5). 418???422–418???422.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026