Andrew M. Bell
Impact in
- Equine top 2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 1%
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Papers in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 8
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 8
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Physiology 15
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 15
- Co-authors
- E. M. Scott (4 shared papers)Andrew J. Todd (19 shared papers)María Gutièrrez‐Mecinas (17 shared papers)Erika Polgár (16 shared papers)Jessica Reid (3 shared papers)Masahiko Watanabe (15 shared papers)Gustavo Calvo (2 shared papers)A. Nolan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (5 papers)Pain (4 papers)Journal of Small Animal Practice (3 papers)eLife (3 papers)Molecular Pain (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew M. Bell
36 papers receiving 823 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Equine 87
- Small Animals 325
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 86
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 213
- Sensory Systems 50
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Bell
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Bell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Bell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Bell. The network helps show where Andrew M. Bell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew M. Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 14 |
About Andrew M. Bell
Andrew M. Bell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Small Animals, Dermatology and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 862 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (15 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (8 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (7 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (87 citations), Small Animals (325 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (86 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (213 citations) and Sensory Systems (50 citations). Andrew M. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include E. M. Scott, Andrew J. Todd, María Gutièrrez‐Mecinas, Erika Polgár, Jessica Reid, Masahiko Watanabe, Gustavo Calvo, A. Nolan, Patricia Pawson and Adam Auckburally. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Pain, Journal of Small Animal Practice, eLife and Molecular Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.