E. M. Scott
Impact in
- Equine top 0.2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 0.1%
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology 13
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 13
- Equine 2
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline ReidA. NolanLesley Wiseman‐OrrJessica ReidAndrea M. NolanPatricia PawsonGustavo CalvoAndrew M. Bell
- Journals
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science (4 papers)Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (4 papers)Journal of Small Animal Practice (4 papers)Veterinary Record (3 papers)American Journal of Veterinary Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
E. M. Scott
61 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Equine 410
- Small Animals 1.3k
- Speech and Hearing 182
- Genetics 700
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 110
Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Scott. The network helps show where E. M. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 72 | |
| 9 | A Global Observatory of Lake Water Quality | 2017 | 0 |
| 10 | 2011 | 121 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 139 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 154 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 51 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 109 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 20 | A study of congenital blindness in British Columbia: methodology and medical findings. | 1968 | 7 |
About E. M. Scott
E. M. Scott is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine, Molecular Medicine, Genetics and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (19 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (13 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (13 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (7 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (6 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers) and Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (410 citations), Small Animals (1.3k citations), Speech and Hearing (182 citations), Genetics (700 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (110 citations). E. M. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Reid, A. Nolan, Lesley Wiseman‐Orr, Jessica Reid, Andrea M. Nolan, A. Nolan, Patricia Pawson, Gustavo Calvo, Andrew M. Bell and Vicki Tariq. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Record and American Journal of Veterinary Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.