Andrew L. Smith
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 0.5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- David B. DeLurgioAngel R. LeónWilliam T. AbrahamMartin G. St. John SuttonTed PlappertDusan Z. KocovicJohn C. MessengerKathryn Hilpisch
- Topics
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (14 papers)Heart Failure Treatment and Management (13 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Andrew L. Smith
28 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.4k
- Surgery 528
- Biomedical Engineering 286
- Epidemiology 193
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 192
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew L. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew L. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew L. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew L. Smith. The network helps show where Andrew L. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew L. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew L. Smith. Andrew L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 118 | |
| 9 | Randomized Controlled Trial of an Implantable Continuous Hemodynamic Monitor in Patients With Advanced Heart Failurebreakdown → | 403 |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 189 | |
| 12 | 114 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 319 | |
| 15 | 140 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 259 | |
| 20 | 110 |
About Andrew L. Smith
Andrew L. Smith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Transplantation and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (14 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (13 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.4k citations), Transplantation (96 citations) and Family Practice (67 citations). Andrew L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David B. DeLurgio, Angel R. León, William T. Abraham, Martin G. St. John Sutton, Ted Plappert, Dusan Z. Kocovic, John C. Messenger, Kathryn Hilpisch, Westby G. Fisher and Michael Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The American Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.