Andrew D. Foote
- Developmental Biology top 0.5%
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior 10
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Marine animal studies overview 51
- Oceanography top 2%
- Marine and coastal plant biology 12
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
-
- Genetic diversity and population structure 17
-
- Identification and Quantification in Food 10
-
- Cephalopods and Marine Biology 9
-
- Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics 8
-
- Marine and fisheries research 7
- Co-authors
- M. Thomas P. GilbertA. Rus HoelzelPhillip A. MorinRichard W. OsborneEske WillerslevPaul R. WadeJason NewtonLudovic Orlando
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew D. Foote
64 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Developmental Biology 503
- Ecology 2.1k
- Oceanography 625
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 310
- Ecological Modeling 92
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew D. Foote
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew D. Foote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew D. Foote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew D. Foote more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew D. Foote
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew D. Foote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew D. Foote. The network helps show where Andrew D. Foote may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew D. Foote, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 17 | Investigating ecological speciation in non-model organisms: a case study of killer whale ecotypes | 2012 | 8 |
| 18 | 2012 | 290 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 317 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 22 |
About Andrew D. Foote
Andrew D. Foote is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Ecology and Oceanography, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine animal studies overview (51 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (17 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (12 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (10 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (10 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (9 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (8 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (503 citations), Ecology (2.1k citations) and Oceanography (625 citations). Andrew D. Foote has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Thomas P. Gilbert, A. Rus Hoelzel, Phillip A. Morin, Richard W. Osborne, Eske Willerslev, Paul R. Wade, Jason Newton, Ludovic Orlando, John W. Durban and Robert L. Pitman. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.