Andrew Carkeet

1.2k total citations
51 papers, 920 citations indexed

About

Andrew Carkeet is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Carkeet has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 920 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Epidemiology, 23 papers in Ophthalmology and 19 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Andrew Carkeet's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (25 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers). Andrew Carkeet is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (25 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers). Andrew Carkeet collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United States. Andrew Carkeet's co-authors include Seang‐Mei Saw, Louis Tong, Dennis M. Levi, Michael J. Collins, Lisa A. Ostrin, Donald Tan, Joanne M. Wood, Huimin Wu, Paul Chew and Nimesh B. Patel and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Ophthalmology and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Carkeet

48 papers receiving 892 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Carkeet Australia 16 494 462 437 232 96 51 920
Anna O’Connor United Kingdom 20 601 1.2× 390 0.8× 763 1.7× 379 1.6× 44 0.5× 65 1.6k
Luuk Franssen Netherlands 15 702 1.4× 962 2.1× 661 1.5× 212 0.9× 154 1.6× 28 1.2k
M J Moseley United Kingdom 14 201 0.4× 272 0.6× 217 0.5× 148 0.6× 35 0.4× 34 587
Leon F. Garner New Zealand 20 716 1.4× 499 1.1× 657 1.5× 77 0.3× 129 1.3× 43 1.0k
Sherry L. Fawcett United States 21 687 1.4× 522 1.1× 228 0.5× 342 1.5× 41 0.4× 30 1.3k
Catherine Suttle Australia 18 462 0.9× 368 0.8× 192 0.4× 498 2.1× 65 0.7× 66 1.1k
Mei Ying Boon Australia 14 330 0.7× 280 0.6× 210 0.5× 218 0.9× 43 0.4× 53 730
Niall C. Strang United Kingdom 21 1000 2.0× 640 1.4× 699 1.6× 578 2.5× 123 1.3× 89 1.4k
Michael W. Neider United States 12 470 1.0× 755 1.6× 568 1.3× 85 0.4× 90 0.9× 15 1.1k
Rosario G. Anera Spain 22 861 1.7× 767 1.7× 731 1.7× 173 0.7× 104 1.1× 75 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Carkeet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Carkeet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Carkeet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Carkeet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Carkeet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Carkeet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Carkeet. The network helps show where Andrew Carkeet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Carkeet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Carkeet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Carkeet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Carkeet. Andrew Carkeet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bentley, Sharon A, et al.. (2025). Ocular allergy and quality of life in a regional Australian optometry practice. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 109(1). 25–31. 1 indexed citations
2.
Atchison, David A., et al.. (2024). Measurement of in vivo lens shapes using IOLMaster 700 B‐scan images: Comparison with phakometry. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 44(5). 1041–1051. 1 indexed citations
3.
Alonso‐Caneiro, David, et al.. (2023). Changes in retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography indices among young adults and children over 1 year. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 107(6). 627–634. 3 indexed citations
4.
Atchison, David A., et al.. (2023). Effects of induced aniseikonia on binocular visual acuity. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 107(1). 51–57. 1 indexed citations
5.
Alonso‐Caneiro, David, et al.. (2021). Induced Refractive Error Changes the Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Transverse Magnification and Vascular Indices. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 229. 230–241. 17 indexed citations
6.
Carkeet, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 41(6). 1176–1182. 1 indexed citations
7.
Carkeet, Andrew. (2019). A Review of the Use of Confidence Intervals for Bland‐Altman Limits of Agreement in Optometry and Vision Science. Optometry and Vision Science. 97(1). 3–8. 25 indexed citations
8.
Carkeet, Andrew. (2019). Stand magnifiers for low vision: description, prescription, assessment. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 103(1). 11–20. 1 indexed citations
9.
Carkeet, Andrew & Ian L. Bailey. (2017). Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 37(2). 118–127. 10 indexed citations
10.
Carkeet, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 38(2). 144–151. 7 indexed citations
11.
Lovie‐Kitchin, J. E., et al.. (2010). Clinical Reading Performance vs. Prolonged Reading Performance in Students With Low Vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 3067–3067. 1 indexed citations
12.
Carkeet, Andrew, et al.. (2003). Higher Order Ocular Aberrations After Cycloplegic and Non-cycloplegic Pupil Dilation. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 19(3). 316–322. 3 indexed citations
13.
Saw, S-M, et al.. (2002). Risk factors for different biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 1508–1508. 1 indexed citations
14.
Carkeet, Andrew. (2001). Modeling logMAR Visual Acuity Scores: Effects of Termination Rules and Alternative Forced-Choice Options. Optometry and Vision Science. 78(7). 529–538. 2 indexed citations
15.
Carney, Leo G., et al.. (1997). Rigid lens dynamics: lid effects.. PubMed. 23(1). 69–77. 10 indexed citations
16.
Carkeet, Andrew, Christine F. Wildsoet, & Joanne M. Wood. (1997). Inter-ocular temporal asynchrony (IOTA): psychophysical measurement of inter-ocular asymmetry of visual latency. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 17(3). 255–262. 8 indexed citations
17.
Carney, Leo G., et al.. (1996). The influence of center of gravity and lens mass on rigid lens dynamics. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 22(3). 195–204. 5 indexed citations
18.
Carkeet, Andrew, Dennis M. Levi, & Ruth E. Manny. (1996). Visibility of motion in infant vernier displays, using adult subjects. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 16(3). 239–242. 1 indexed citations
19.
Levi, Dennis M. & Andrew Carkeet. (1993). Amblyopia: a consequence of abnormal visual development. Centre for Health Research; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation. 68 indexed citations
20.
Collins, Michael J., Brian Brown, Katherine Bowman, & Andrew Carkeet. (1990). Workstation variables and visual discomfort associated with VDTs. Applied Ergonomics. 21(2). 157–161. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna O’Connor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luuk Franssen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M J Moseley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leon F. Garner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sherry L. Fawcett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine Suttle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mei Ying Boon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Niall C. Strang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael W. Neider Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rosario G. Anera
Rankless by CCL
2026