Anna O’Connor

2.2k total citations
65 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Anna O’Connor is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna O’Connor has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Epidemiology, 28 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 21 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Anna O’Connor's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (33 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (24 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers). Anna O’Connor is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (33 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (24 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers). Anna O’Connor collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Anna O’Connor's co-authors include Eileen E. Birch, Alistair R. Fielder, Susan Anderson, C Wilson, Marianne Piano, Terence Stephenson, Sonia Ratib, Merrick J. Moseley, Michael Tobin and Margaret Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PEDIATRICS and Journal of Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Anna O’Connor

61 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna O’Connor United Kingdom 20 763 601 573 413 390 65 1.6k
D Kurtz United States 27 607 0.8× 702 1.2× 164 0.3× 403 1.0× 448 1.1× 100 2.5k
Sherry L. Fawcett United States 21 228 0.3× 687 1.1× 99 0.2× 19 0.0× 522 1.3× 30 1.3k
Stefania Maria Bova Italy 16 188 0.2× 203 0.3× 344 0.6× 55 0.1× 65 0.2× 35 891
Luc Cornette Belgium 22 106 0.1× 150 0.2× 611 1.1× 474 1.1× 14 0.0× 56 1.5k
Richa Trivedi India 23 739 1.0× 343 0.6× 395 0.7× 55 0.1× 11 0.0× 57 1.5k
Kang Min Park South Korea 22 495 0.6× 200 0.3× 383 0.7× 76 0.2× 11 0.0× 190 1.8k
Mehmet Dumlu Aydın Türkiye 20 66 0.1× 64 0.1× 88 0.2× 132 0.3× 100 0.3× 125 1.2k
Ronald A. Rauch United States 18 165 0.2× 238 0.4× 87 0.2× 131 0.3× 7 0.0× 42 1.2k
Hadi Ostadimoghaddam Iran 26 1.2k 1.6× 1.4k 2.3× 40 0.1× 17 0.0× 1.4k 3.5× 133 2.1k
Bernd F. Remler United States 21 70 0.1× 77 0.1× 95 0.2× 61 0.1× 259 0.7× 48 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna O’Connor. The network helps show where Anna O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna O’Connor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna O’Connor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna O’Connor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna O’Connor. Anna O’Connor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Connor, Anna, et al.. (2024). Do Socioeconomic Inequalities Exist Within Ophthalmology and Orthoptics in the UK?: A Scoping Review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 20(1). 31–47.
2.
Jones, L. A., et al.. (2024). Evaluating the Use of Contrast Sensitivity Tests By Orthoptists in the UK. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 20(1). 48–56.
3.
O’Connor, Anna, et al.. (2023). Test retest variability in stereoacuity measurements. Strabismus. 31(3). 188–196. 1 indexed citations
4.
O’Connor, Anna, et al.. (2022). Using a Computerised Staircase and Incremental Optotype Sizes to Improve Visual Acuity Assessment Accuracy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(1). 93–100. 1 indexed citations
5.
Waters, Martha A., et al.. (2021). The Accuracy of GP Referrals into Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Orthoptic Department. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(1). 91–96. 3 indexed citations
6.
Garg, Parvesh Mohan, et al.. (2021). Hematological predictors of mortality in neonates with fulminant necrotizing enterocolitis. Journal of Perinatology. 41(5). 1110–1121. 31 indexed citations
7.
O’Connor, Anna, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of a New Method to Track Changes in Vision at Home for Children Undergoing Amblyopia Treatment. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(1). 70–78. 3 indexed citations
9.
Piano, Marianne, et al.. (2016). Normative Values for Near and Distance Clinical Tests of Stereoacuity. Strabismus. 24(4). 169–172. 23 indexed citations
10.
Black, Robert H., et al.. (2015). Clinical Assessment of Stereoacuity and 3-D Stereoscopic Entertainment. Strabismus. 23(4). 164–169. 9 indexed citations
11.
Knox, Paul C., et al.. (2014). Effects of age and blur on, and test-retest variability of, a handheld radial shape deformation test. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 5605–5605. 1 indexed citations
12.
Newsham, David & Anna O’Connor. (2010). Intractable Diplopia Resulting from the Treatment of Amblyopia and Use of the Sbisa Bar in the UK to Assess the Risk. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 4347–4347. 2 indexed citations
13.
Wang, Jingyun, Sarah R. Hatt, Anna O’Connor, et al.. (2010). Final Version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: Normative data, reliability, and validity. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 14(2). 142–146. 34 indexed citations
14.
O’Connor, Anna, Rand Spencer, & Eileen E. Birch. (2007). Predicting long-term visual outcome in children with birth weight under 1001 g. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 11(6). 541–545. 14 indexed citations
15.
O’Connor, Anna. (2004). Visual function in low birthweight children. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 88(9). 1149–1153. 74 indexed citations
16.
Hoffman, Dennis R., Richard C. Theuer, Yolanda S. Castañeda, et al.. (2004). Maturation of Visual Acuity Is Accelerated in Breast-Fed Term Infants Fed Baby Food Containing DHA-Enriched Egg Yolk. Journal of Nutrition. 134(9). 2307–2313. 106 indexed citations
17.
O’Connor, Anna. (2004). A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 89(9). 831–835. 4 indexed citations
18.
O’Connor, Anna, Eileen E. Birch, Joel N. Leffler, Solange Rios Salomão, & Rand Spencer. (2003). Infant Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Preferential-Looking (PL) Grating Acuity as Predictors for Recognition Acuity in Low Birth Weight Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 2712–2712. 1 indexed citations
19.
O’Connor, Anna, et al.. (2001). Educational attainment associated with ophthalmic morbidity in a low birth weight population. UCL Discovery (University College London). 4 indexed citations
20.
Birch, Eileen E. & Anna O’Connor. (2001). Preterm birth and visual development. Seminars in Neonatology. 6(6). 487–497. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026