Andrew Botros

446 total citations
9 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

Andrew Botros is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Botros has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Signal Processing and 4 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Andrew Botros's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (3 papers). Andrew Botros is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (3 papers). Andrew Botros collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Germany. Andrew Botros's co-authors include Colleen Psarros, Bas van Dijk, Matthijs Killian, John R. Lindsay Smith, Joe Wolfe, Thomas Wesarg, Andrzej Zarowski, Roland Laszig, Jon K. Shallop and André Morsnowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Ear and Hearing, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and International Journal of Audiology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Botros

9 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew Botros Australia	7	258	178	68	65	47	9	331
D. Byrne Australia	10	359 1.4×	173 1.0×	248 3.6×	99 1.5×	1 0.0×	24	429
Junghwa Bahng South Korea	10	202 0.8×	82 0.5×	117 1.7×	53 0.8×		51	288
Kenneth W. Berger United States	11	122 0.5×	30 0.2×	39 0.6×	64 1.0×		31	391
Jing Lyu China	6	74 0.3×	46 0.3×	17 0.3×	25 0.4×		26	158
Robert Mannell Australia	10	120 0.5×	41 0.2×	41 0.6×	75 1.2×		18	298
Rosy Southwell United States	8	189 0.7×	23 0.1×	27 0.4×	41 0.6×	1 0.0×	14	245
Elizabeth G. Reynolds United States	4	335 1.3×	111 0.6×	144 2.1×	164 2.5×	1 0.0×	7	456
Robert S. Bauer Hong Kong	9	109 0.4×	7 0.0×	6 0.1×	35 0.5×	13 0.3×	32	496
William A. Shaw United States	9	76 0.3×	5 0.0×	12 0.2×	10 0.2×	15 0.3×	26	237
Joanna L. Brooks United Kingdom	7	297 1.2×	16 0.1×	60 0.9×	48 0.7×		9	394

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Botros

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Botros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Botros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Botros more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Botros

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Botros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Botros. The network helps show where Andrew Botros may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Botros

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Botros. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Botros based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Botros. Andrew Botros is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Botros, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Digital Government: A Primer and Professional Perspectives. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 74(1). 42–52. 55 indexed citations

2.

Botros, Andrew, et al.. (2013). The next generation of Nucleus^®fitting: A multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management. International Journal of Audiology. 52(7). 485–494. 24 indexed citations

3.

Botros, Andrew & Colleen Psarros. (2010). Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: I. The Relevance of ECAP Threshold Profiles and Scaled Profiles to Cochlear Implant Fitting. Ear and Hearing. 31(3). 367–379. 61 indexed citations

4.

Botros, Andrew & Colleen Psarros. (2010). Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: II. The Influence of Neural Population on the ECAP Recovery Function and Refractoriness. Ear and Hearing. 31(3). 380–391. 49 indexed citations

5.

Dijk, Bas van, Andrew Botros, Rolf‐Dieter Battmer, et al.. (2007). Clinical Results of AutoNRT,™ a Completely Automatic ECAP Recording System for Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing. 28(4). 558–570. 59 indexed citations

6.

Botros, Andrew, Bas van Dijk, & Matthijs Killian. (2006). AutoNRT™: An automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus® Freedom™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 40(1). 15–28. 68 indexed citations

7.

Botros, Andrew, John R. Lindsay Smith, & Joe Wolfe. (2006). The Virtual Flute: an advanced fingering guide generated via machine intelligence. Journal of New Music Research. 35(3). 183–196. 5 indexed citations

8.

Botros, Andrew, John R. Lindsay Smith, & Joe Wolfe. (2003). THE 'VIRTUAL FLUTE': ACOUSTIC MODELLING AT THE SERVICE OF PLAYERS AND COMPOSERS. 2 indexed citations

9.

Botros, Andrew, John R. Lindsay Smith, & Joe Wolfe. (2002). THE VIRTUAL BOEHM FLUTE — A WEB SERVICE THAT PREDICTS MULTIPHONICS, MICROTONES AND ALTERNATIVE FINGERINGS. Acoustics Australia. 30(2). 61–65. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact