J. Müller-Deile

1.1k total citations
38 papers, 761 citations indexed

About

J. Müller-Deile is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Müller-Deile has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 761 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Sensory Systems and 8 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in J. Müller-Deile's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (30 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (8 papers). J. Müller-Deile is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (30 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (8 papers). J. Müller-Deile collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Switzerland. J. Müller-Deile's co-authors include Norbert Dillier, Matthias Hey, M. Stecker, Thomas Hocke, André Morsnowski, Wai Kong Lai, Roland Laszig, Jürgen Hedderich, Matthijs Killian and Ernst von Wallenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Hearing Research, Journal of Neuroscience Methods and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

J. Müller-Deile

36 papers receiving 731 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Müller-Deile Germany 14 717 469 308 189 74 38 761
Soha N. Garadat Jordan 13 637 0.9× 453 1.0× 361 1.2× 155 0.8× 42 0.6× 25 695
Wendy Parkinson United States 12 631 0.9× 410 0.9× 302 1.0× 162 0.9× 66 0.9× 16 672
Aniket A. Saoji United States 15 755 1.1× 500 1.1× 388 1.3× 203 1.1× 77 1.0× 52 803
Catherine M. Sucher Australia 10 588 0.8× 331 0.7× 315 1.0× 163 0.9× 64 0.9× 28 615
Robert T. Dwyer United States 15 700 1.0× 554 1.2× 306 1.0× 134 0.7× 130 1.8× 34 744
Rolf D. Battmer Germany 13 611 0.9× 432 0.9× 182 0.6× 118 0.6× 190 2.6× 19 677
David C. Kelsall United States 11 704 1.0× 450 1.0× 297 1.0× 157 0.8× 199 2.7× 13 761
Dan Gnansia France 16 519 0.7× 287 0.6× 223 0.7× 177 0.9× 64 0.9× 43 621
Bram Van Dun Australia 16 663 0.9× 343 0.7× 151 0.5× 160 0.8× 30 0.4× 48 724
S Staller United States 13 685 1.0× 341 0.7× 192 0.6× 203 1.1× 126 1.7× 14 781

Countries citing papers authored by J. Müller-Deile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Müller-Deile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Müller-Deile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Müller-Deile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Müller-Deile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Müller-Deile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Müller-Deile. The network helps show where J. Müller-Deile may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Müller-Deile

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Müller-Deile. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Müller-Deile based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Müller-Deile. J. Müller-Deile is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Müller-Deile, J., et al.. (2021). Comparisons of electrophysiological and psychophysical fitting methods for cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology. 62(2). 118–128. 4 indexed citations
2.
Müller-Deile, J., et al.. (2017). Facilitation and refractoriness of the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hearing Research. 355. 14–22. 12 indexed citations
3.
Hocke, Thomas, et al.. (2016). A clinical assessment of cochlear implant recipient performance: implications for individualized map settings in specific environments. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273(11). 4011–4020. 24 indexed citations
4.
Hey, Matthias, et al.. (2015). The Intra-Cochlear Impedance-Matrix (IIM) test for the Nucleus® cochlear implant. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 60(2). 123–33. 10 indexed citations
5.
Hey, Matthias & J. Müller-Deile. (2014). Accuracy of measurement in electrically evoked compound action potentials. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 239. 214–222. 13 indexed citations
6.
Hey, Matthias, Thomas Hocke, Jürgen Hedderich, & J. Müller-Deile. (2014). Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: Reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients. International Journal of Audiology. 53(12). 895–902. 63 indexed citations
7.
Huarte, Alicia, Ángel Mazón, Constantino Morera, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of neural response telemetry (NRT™) with focus on long-term rate adaptation over a wide range of stimulation rates. Cochlear Implants International. 15(3). 136–144. 3 indexed citations
8.
Akın, İstemihan, Dietmar Basta, J. Müller-Deile, et al.. (2012). Results of a Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating a New Smart Algorithm to Measure Neural Response Imaging. Otology & Neurotology. 33(5). 736–739. 3 indexed citations
9.
Battmer, Rolf‐Dieter, Norbert Dillier, Wai Kong Lai, et al.. (2010). Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear™ Nucleus®CI24RE device: Relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles. International Journal of Audiology. 49(9). 657–666. 9 indexed citations
10.
Müller-Deile, J.. (2009). Sprachverständlichkeitsuntersuchungen bei Kochleaimplantatpatienten. HNO. 57(6). 580–592. 18 indexed citations
11.
Hoth, S. & J. Müller-Deile. (2009). Audiologische Rehabilitation von Kochleaimplantat-Trägern. HNO. 57(7). 635–648. 24 indexed citations
12.
Müller-Deile, J., et al.. (2008). Verbesserung der Sprachverständlichkeit durch neuen Cochlear-Implant-Sprachprozessor. HNO. 57(6). 567–574. 24 indexed citations
13.
Morsnowski, André, et al.. (2008). Das Refraktärverhalten des elektrisch stimulierten Hörnervs. HNO. 56(2). 131–138. 1 indexed citations
14.
Dijk, Bas van, Andrew Botros, Rolf‐Dieter Battmer, et al.. (2007). Clinical Results of AutoNRT,™ a Completely Automatic ECAP Recording System for Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing. 28(4). 558–570. 59 indexed citations
15.
Morsnowski, André, et al.. (2006). Measuring the Refractoriness of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve. Audiology and Neurotology. 11(6). 389–402. 57 indexed citations
16.
Müller-Deile, J., et al.. (2005). Impact to the head increases cochlear implant reimplantation rate in children. Auris Nasus Larynx. 32(4). 339–343. 37 indexed citations
17.
Laszig, Roland, Antje Aschendorff, M. Stecker, et al.. (2004). Benefits of Bilateral Electrical Stimulation with the Nucleus Cochlear Implant in Adults: 6-Month Postoperative Results. Otology & Neurotology. 25(6). 958–968. 160 indexed citations
18.
Müller-Deile, J., et al.. (1998). Cochlear-Implant-Versorgung bei nicht tauben Patienten?*. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 77(3). 136–143. 8 indexed citations
19.
Dillier, Norbert, et al.. (1995). Multícentric Field Evaluation of a New Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants. International Journal of Audiology. 34(3). 145–159. 15 indexed citations
20.
Müller-Deile, J., Brian J. Schmidt, & H. Rudert. (1994). Kieler Erfahrungen mit der Cochlear Implant-Versorgung*. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 73(6). 300–310. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Soha N. Garadat Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wendy Parkinson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aniket A. Saoji Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine M. Sucher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert T. Dwyer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rolf D. Battmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David C. Kelsall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dan Gnansia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bram Van Dun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S Staller
Rankless by CCL
2026