Andrew B. Williams

18 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Andrew B. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Social Psychology 157
  • Artificial Intelligence 137
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
  • Human-Computer Interaction 72
Replace Doris M. Dehn with:
Doris M. Dehn Germany
Jarmo Laaksolahti Sweden
Nadia Mana Italy
Birgit Lugrin Germany
Alessandro Cappelletti Italy
Kristinn R. Þórisson Iceland
Ina Wechsung Germany
Sherman W. Tyler United States
Erik Nilsen United States
Leimin Tian Australia
Andrew B. Williams relative to Doris M. Dehn Germany Doris M. Dehn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Doris M. Dehn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew B. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew B. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew B. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew B. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew B. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew B. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew B. Williams. The network helps show where Andrew B. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew B. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew B. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew B. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew B. Williams. Andrew B. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2 3
3 4
4 2
5 6
6 2
7 40
8 185
9 49
10
SpelBots: Using Autonomous Robotics to Inspire Women to Participate in Computer Science.
3
11
The ARTSI Alliance: Recruiting Underrepresented Students to Computer Science and Robotics to Improve Society.
6
12 6
13 1
14 23
15 44
16
Developmental and Operational Processes for Agent-Oriented Database Navigation for Knowledge Discovery.
1
17 3
18
An instance-based approach for identifying candidate ontology relations within a multi-agent system
8
19 0

About Andrew B. Williams

Andrew B. Williams is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (5 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (72 citations), Social Psychology (157 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations). Andrew B. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Angela Tinwell, Mark Grimshaw, M. Brian Blake, Anand Padmanabhan, Costas Tsatsoulis, Yi‐Ju Yang, David S. Touretzky, Chutima Boonthum, R. Williams and Xiangyu Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering and Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026