Andreas Fisch

720 citations
20 papers · 545 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Andreas Fisch

19 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Andreas Fisch
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Pharmaceutical Science 113
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 77
  • Biomaterials 96
  • Biochemistry 35
  • Internal Medicine 16
Replace Guoxing You with:
Guoxing You China
Lian Zhao China
Jingyi Li China
Guifang Dou China
Poonam Sharma Australia
J P Andreux France
Hugh Schieren United States
Raymond L. Henry United States
Isabelle Lamarche France
Nilesh Gupta United States
Andreas Fisch relative to Guoxing You China Guoxing You's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Guoxing You · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Fisch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Fisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Fisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Fisch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Fisch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Fisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Fisch. The network helps show where Andreas Fisch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Fisch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Fisch Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Fisch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2020115
2 201289
3 201856
4 200042
5 200537
6 200629
7 199526
8 199424
9 199924
10 199722
11 200621
12 202218
13 199514
14 199211
15 20077
16 20075
17 19953
18 20231
19 20021
20 20170

About Andreas Fisch

Andreas Fisch is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmaceutical Science, Surgery and Hematology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (5 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (3 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (3 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Hemostasis and retained surgical items (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (113 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (77 citations), Biomaterials (96 citations), Biochemistry (35 citations) and Internal Medicine (16 citations). Andreas Fisch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Meyer, Harald Darius, Bernd Riebesehl, Arnaud Grandeury, Robert K. Prud’homme, Jörg Brozio, Nathalie M. Pinkerton, Twan Lammers, Farshad Ramazani and Harald Darius. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Thrombosis Research, Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Discovery Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact