Andrea Choe

1.1k total citations
9 papers, 783 citations indexed

About

Andrea Choe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aging and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrea Choe has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 783 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Aging and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Andrea Choe's work include Nematode management and characterization studies (3 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers). Andrea Choe is often cited by papers focused on Nematode management and characterization studies (3 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers). Andrea Choe collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Andrea Choe's co-authors include Paul W. Sternberg, Frank C. Schroeder, Stephan H. von Reuß, Edward G. Platzer, Robin B. Gasser, Mario R. Blanco, Viviana Gradinaru, May Hui, Tomomi Karigo and Benjamin E. Deverman and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Andrea Choe

9 papers receiving 775 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrea Choe United States 9 265 192 140 117 107 9 783
Thomas Boulin France 17 117 0.4× 546 2.8× 539 3.9× 73 0.6× 44 0.4× 27 1.1k
Alexander M. van der Linden United States 14 82 0.3× 672 3.5× 665 4.8× 40 0.3× 39 0.4× 25 1.2k
Marleen Lindemans Belgium 15 33 0.1× 202 1.1× 263 1.9× 118 1.0× 143 1.3× 18 723
Balint Z Kacsoh United States 25 93 0.4× 218 1.1× 35 0.3× 537 4.6× 136 1.3× 59 1.5k
Tsai‐Feng Fu Taiwan 17 79 0.3× 277 1.4× 107 0.8× 166 1.4× 26 0.2× 34 1.1k
Christopher J. Franks United Kingdom 15 76 0.3× 222 1.2× 370 2.6× 64 0.5× 82 0.8× 17 627
Piotr Bębas Poland 16 107 0.4× 123 0.6× 98 0.7× 96 0.8× 50 0.5× 32 778
Heather Chatwin United Kingdom 9 45 0.2× 204 1.1× 161 1.1× 178 1.5× 42 0.4× 10 717
Michael J. Texada Denmark 21 95 0.4× 297 1.5× 154 1.1× 254 2.2× 14 0.1× 30 1.3k
Candida Rogers United Kingdom 8 49 0.2× 128 0.7× 420 3.0× 39 0.3× 80 0.7× 9 652

Countries citing papers authored by Andrea Choe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea Choe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea Choe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea Choe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea Choe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea Choe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea Choe. The network helps show where Andrea Choe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea Choe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea Choe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea Choe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea Choe. Andrea Choe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Shinoda, Kenta, Andrea Choe, Kiyoshi Hirahara, et al.. (2022). Nematode ascarosides attenuate mammalian type 2 inflammatory responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(9). 10 indexed citations
2.
Zhang, Ying K., Murli Manohar, Alexander B. Artyukhin, et al.. (2021). Nematode Signaling Molecules Are Extensively Metabolized by Animals, Plants, and Microorganisms. ACS Chemical Biology. 16(6). 1050–1058. 15 indexed citations
3.
Zelikowsky, Moriel, May Hui, Tomomi Karigo, et al.. (2018). The Neuropeptide Tac2 Controls a Distributed Brain State Induced by Chronic Social Isolation Stress. Cell. 173(5). 1265–1279.e19. 190 indexed citations
4.
Manosalva, Patricia, Murli Manohar, Stephan H. von Reuß, et al.. (2015). Conserved nematode signalling molecules elicit plant defenses and pathogen resistance. Nature Communications. 6(1). 7795–7795. 188 indexed citations
5.
Choe, Andrea, et al.. (2014). Communication between oocytes and somatic cells regulates volatile pheromone production in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(50). 17905–17910. 35 indexed citations
6.
Choe, Andrea, Tatsuji Chuman, Stephan H. von Reuß, et al.. (2012). Sex-specific mating pheromones in the nematode Panagrellus redivivus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(51). 20949–20954. 60 indexed citations
7.
Choe, Andrea, Stephan H. von Reuß, Robin B. Gasser, et al.. (2012). Ascaroside Signaling Is Widely Conserved among Nematodes. Current Biology. 22(9). 772–780. 157 indexed citations
8.
Lee, Lily, Joaquin J. Estrada, Frédéric Sala, et al.. (2007). Fibroblast growth factor 10 is critical for liver growth during embryogenesis and controls hepatoblast survival via β-catenin activation. Hepatology. 46(4). 1187–1197. 105 indexed citations
9.
Choe, Andrea, et al.. (2006). Expression patterns of Hox10 paralogous genes during lumbar spinal cord development. Gene Expression Patterns. 6(7). 730–737. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026