Bryan Myers

744 total citations
30 papers, 469 citations indexed

About

Bryan Myers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Law and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Bryan Myers has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 469 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Social Psychology, 20 papers in Law and 9 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Bryan Myers's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (19 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (17 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (9 papers). Bryan Myers is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (19 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (17 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (9 papers). Bryan Myers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Canada. Bryan Myers's co-authors include Len Lecci, Jack Arbuthnot, Edith Greene, Steven Jay Lynn, Narina Nuñez, David G. Payne, Kimberly Schweitzer, Katherine A. Mitchell, Andre Kehn and Sally MacKain and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Directions in Psychological Science, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Applied Cognitive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Bryan Myers

28 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bryan Myers United States 11 235 215 151 125 107 30 469
Robert W. Hymes United States 9 74 0.3× 104 0.5× 205 1.4× 77 0.6× 56 0.5× 10 333
Andre Kehn United States 13 48 0.2× 178 0.8× 243 1.6× 170 1.4× 101 0.9× 42 451
Tarika Daftary‐Kapur United States 9 62 0.3× 81 0.4× 104 0.7× 23 0.2× 29 0.3× 19 236
Katrin Mueller‐Johnson United Kingdom 14 21 0.1× 65 0.3× 153 1.0× 151 1.2× 46 0.4× 33 391
Ivar R. Hannikainen Spain 13 60 0.3× 154 0.7× 143 0.9× 11 0.1× 315 2.9× 60 488
Alicia Summers United States 10 21 0.1× 93 0.4× 231 1.5× 102 0.8× 23 0.2× 37 432
Judith E. Krulewitz United States 9 56 0.2× 144 0.7× 224 1.5× 293 2.3× 29 0.3× 11 448
Jennifer J. Ratcliff United States 11 24 0.1× 199 0.9× 162 1.1× 59 0.5× 47 0.4× 22 321
Margit Oswald Switzerland 7 21 0.1× 80 0.4× 129 0.9× 16 0.1× 102 1.0× 27 272
Robin West United States 11 98 0.4× 12 0.1× 96 0.6× 54 0.4× 26 0.2× 49 303

Countries citing papers authored by Bryan Myers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bryan Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bryan Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bryan Myers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bryan Myers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bryan Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bryan Myers. The network helps show where Bryan Myers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bryan Myers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bryan Myers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bryan Myers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bryan Myers. Bryan Myers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2023). The Influence of False Evidence Ploy Variants on Perceptions of Coercion and Deception. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. 24(4). 500–523.
2.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2018). The heterogeneity of victim impact statements: A content analysis of capital trial sentencing penalty phase transcripts.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 24(4). 474–488. 4 indexed citations
3.
Nuñez, Narina, Bryan Myers, Benjamin M. Wilkowski, & Kimberly Schweitzer. (2017). The Impact of Angry Versus Sad Victim Impact Statements on Mock Jurors’ Sentencing Decisions in a Capital Trial. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 44(6). 862–886. 10 indexed citations
4.
Nuñez, Narina, et al.. (2015). Negative Emotions Felt During Trial: the Effect of Fear, Anger, and Sadness on Juror Decision Making. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 29(2). 200–209. 29 indexed citations
5.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2014). False memories for highly aversive early childhood events: Effects of guided imagery and group influence.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 1(1). 20–31. 6 indexed citations
6.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2011). Victim impact statements and crime heinousness: a test of the saturation hypothesis. Psychology Crime and Law. 19(2). 129–143. 8 indexed citations
7.
MacKain, Sally, et al.. (2010). Job Satisfaction Among Psychologists Working in State Prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 37(3). 306–318. 11 indexed citations
8.
Lecci, Len & Bryan Myers. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology Crime and Law. 15(7). 619–634. 19 indexed citations
9.
Zimmerman, David, et al.. (2008). Victim Impact Statements: The Role of Expectations in Juror Judgments. 1 indexed citations
10.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2006). The Court of Public Opinion: Lay Perceptions of Polygraph Testing.. Law and Human Behavior. 30(4). 509–523. 4 indexed citations
11.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2006). Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 19(1). 13–20. 9 indexed citations
12.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2004). Therapeutic Community Counselors: The Effects of Training and Personal Substance Abuse History on Job Stress and Professional Efficacy. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 4(3). 31–49. 3 indexed citations
13.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2004). Who Is the Victim Anyway? The Effects of Bystander Victim Impact Statements on Mock Juror Sentencing Decisions. Violence and Victims. 19(3). 357–374. 23 indexed citations
14.
Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2003). Polygraph Evidence and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Corroborating Evidence1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 33(5). 948–962. 5 indexed citations
15.
Arbuthnot, Jack, et al.. (2002). Linking juror prejudgment and pretrial publicity knowledge: Some methodological considerations.. 7 indexed citations
16.
Lecci, Len & Bryan Myers. (2002). Examining the construct validity of the original and revised JBS: A cross-validation of sample and method.. Law and Human Behavior. 26(4). 455–463. 21 indexed citations
17.
Myers, Bryan, Steven Jay Lynn, & Jack Arbuthnot. (2002). Victim Impact Testimony and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Harm Information and Witness Demeanor1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 32(11). 2393–2412. 42 indexed citations
18.
Myers, Bryan & Len Lecci. (1998). Revising the factor structure of the Juror Bias Scale: A method for the empirical validation of theoretical constructs.. Law and Human Behavior. 22(2). 239–256. 31 indexed citations
19.
Rhue, Judith W., et al.. (1994). Pseudomemory in Hypnotized and Simulating Subjects. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 42(2). 118–129. 7 indexed citations
20.
Spaños, Nicholas P., et al.. (1992). The Effects of Polygraph Evidence and Eyewitness Testimony on the Beliefs and Decisions of Mock Jurors. Imagination Cognition and Personality. 12(2). 103–113. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026