Anabela Santos

418 citations
25 papers · 241 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Anabela Santos

23 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Anabela Santos
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Economics and Econometrics 148
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 27
  • Accounting 40
  • Transportation 17
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21
Replace Marta Arbelo-Pérez with:
Marta Arbelo-Pérez Spain
Mirko Titze Germany
Nimesh Salike China
Ernest Liu United States
Ningyu Qian China
Benjamin Montmartin France
Bogang Jun South Korea
Mustafa Özer Türkiye
Mohamed Ayadi Canada
Manuel García‐Santana Spain
Anabela Santos relative to Marta Arbelo-Pérez Spain Marta Arbelo-Pérez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Marta Arbelo-Pérez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anabela Santos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anabela Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anabela Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anabela Santos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anabela Santos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anabela Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anabela Santos. The network helps show where Anabela Santos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Anabela Santos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anabela Santos Line = papers co-authored together Anabela Santos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202157
2 201834
3 201928
4 202417
5 202316
6 201513
7 202310
8 20198
9
Innovation and Access to Finance – A Review of the Literature
20157
10 20246
11 20246
12 20226
13 20236
14 20245
15 20145
16 20245
17 20243
18 20253
19 20182
20 20151

About Anabela Santos

Anabela Santos is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Development and Policy (14 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (8 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (3 papers), Polish socio-economic development (3 papers) and Regional resilience and development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (148 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (27 citations), Accounting (40 citations), Transportation (17 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (21 citations). Anabela Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Michele Cincera, Andrea Conte, Javier Barbero, Simone Salotti, Giovanni Cerulli, Alex Coad, Nicola Francesco Dotti, Francesco Cappellano, Dimitrios Pontikakis and Ernesto Rodríguez‐Crespo. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Studies Regional Science, European Planning Studies, Papers of the Regional Science Association, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics and Economic Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact