Ana Such Díaz
About
In The Last Decade
Ana Such Díaz
7 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 34
- Family Practice 24
- Economics and Econometrics 13
- Infectious Diseases 8
- Epidemiology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Ana Such Díaz
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Such Díaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Such Díaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Such Díaz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Such Díaz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Such Díaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Such Díaz. The network helps show where Ana Such Díaz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana Such Díaz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana Such Díaz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana Such Díaz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana Such Díaz. Ana Such Díaz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.