Ana Peciña
Impact in
- Genetics top 10%
- Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
-
- RNA modifications and cancer
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- RNA Research and Splicing
- Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Papers in
-
- RNA Research and Splicing 2
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 2
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 6
- Co-authors
- Salud Borrego (10 shared papers)Guillermo Antiñolo (11 shared papers)A. Paneque (4 shared papers)Alain Nicolas (1 shared paper)Kunihiro Ohta (1 shared paper)Hajime Murakami (1 shared paper)Kathleen N. Smith (1 shared paper)Christine Mézard (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Ana Peciña
16 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Genetics 148
- Molecular Biology 240
- Biotechnology 24
- Aquatic Science 18
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 43
Countries citing papers authored by Ana Peciña
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Peciña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Peciña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Peciña more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Peciña
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Peciña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Peciña. The network helps show where Ana Peciña may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Peciña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 131 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0 |
About Ana Peciña
Ana Peciña is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (3 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (2 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (148 citations), Molecular Biology (240 citations), Biotechnology (24 citations), Aquatic Science (18 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (43 citations). Ana Peciña has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Argentina and France. Frequent co-authors include Salud Borrego, Guillermo Antiñolo, A. Paneque, Alain Nicolas, Kunihiro Ohta, Hajime Murakami, Kathleen N. Smith, Christine Mézard, Raquel M. Fernández and Francisco Javier Álvarez Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as BioMed Research International, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Journal of Bacteriology, Reproductive BioMedicine Online and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.