Ana Jorge

53 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

Ana Jorge
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Communication 205
  • Gender Studies 121
  • Sociology and Political Science 456
  • Education 258
  • Molecular Medicine 35
Replace Joseph A. DeVito with:
Joseph A. DeVito United States
Mari Matsuda Japan
Cassandra M. Chapman Australia
Hyun Ju Jeong United States
Leah P. Macfadyen Canada
Deanna Ferree Womack United States
Laura Cervi Spain
Christopher Weber United States
Stacy L. Smith United States
G. Tarcan Kumkale Türkiye
Ana Jorge relative to Joseph A. DeVito United States Joseph A. DeVito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Joseph A. DeVito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Jorge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Jorge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Jorge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Jorge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Jorge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Jorge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Jorge. The network helps show where Ana Jorge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Jorge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Jorge Line = papers co-authored together Ana Jorge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Digital Parenting. The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age
2018132
2 201974
3 202167
4 201158
5 201155
6 201951
7 201146
8 202241
9 201037
10 201134
11 201426
12 201824
13 202221
14 201321
15 202117
16 202214
17 202411
18
Digital Parenting : The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age, Yearbook 2018
201811
19 202310
20 20138

About Ana Jorge

Ana Jorge is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Gender Studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 60 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (17 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (14 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (14 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (14 papers), Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (5 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (205 citations), Gender Studies (121 citations), Sociology and Political Science (456 citations), Education (258 citations) and Molecular Medicine (35 citations). Ana Jorge has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Cristina Ponte, Mariana G. Pinho, Giovanna Mascheroni, Helena Veiga, João Paulo Gomes, Egbert Hoiczyk, Patricia Reed, Pedro M. Pereira, Mohammed Terrak and Tero Karppi. Their work appears in journals such as MedieKultur Journal of media and communication research, Social Media + Society, Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, New Media & Society and Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact