Ana Debón

32 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

Ana Debón
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Demography 237
  • Health 88
  • General Health Professions 184
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 102
  • Management Science and Operations Research 50
Replace Marie-Claire Koissi with:
Marie-Claire Koissi United States
Shiying Wu China
Miguel Santolino Spain
Katharina Schmidt Germany
Robert L. Eberlein United States
M L Senior United Kingdom
Riccardo Borgoni Italy
Norman J. Johnson United States
Salvatore Scognamiglio Italy
Ana Debón relative to Marie-Claire Koissi United States Marie-Claire Koissi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
Marie-Claire Koissi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Debón

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Debón's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Debón with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Debón more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Debón

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Debón. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Debón. The network helps show where Ana Debón may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Debón, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Debón Line = papers co-authored together Ana Debón links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200979
2 200747
3 201030
4 201030
5 200625
6 200723
7 201822
8 201120
9 201719
10 202018
11
A comparison of parametric models for mortality graduation. Application to mortality data of the Valencia Region (Spain)
200517
12 201514
13 200613
14 201213
15 201812
16 201211
17 20128
18 20138
19 20186
20 20206

About Ana Debón

Ana Debón is a scholar working on Demography, General Health Professions, Health, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (24 papers), Global Health Care Issues (19 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (5 papers), Water Systems and Optimization (3 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (2 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (237 citations), Health (88 citations), General Health Professions (184 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (102 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (50 citations). Ana Debón has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Colombia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Montes, Andrés Carrión García, Enrique Cabrera, Francisco Martínez, Francisco Puig, Ramón Sala‐Garrido, María Luz Gámiz, Patricia Carracedo, J. Carlos Garcı́a-Dı́az and Josep Domènech. Their work appears in journals such as Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Insurance Mathematics and Economics, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Genus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact