Ana D. Caperta
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
-
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Papers in
-
- Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna 15
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 10
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 4
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
-
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 8
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 4
- Co-authors
- Wanda Viegas (11 shared papers)Andreas Houben (4 shared papers)Margarida Delgado (7 shared papers)Leonor Morais–Cecílio (5 shared papers)Dmitri Demidov (2 shared papers)Raheleh Karimi-Ashtiyani (2 shared papers)Nuno Neves (3 shared papers)Espírito Santo (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Ana D. Caperta
39 papers receiving 824 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Plant Science 611
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 169
- Molecular Biology 363
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 59
- Cell Biology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Ana D. Caperta
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana D. Caperta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana D. Caperta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana D. Caperta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana D. Caperta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana D. Caperta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana D. Caperta. The network helps show where Ana D. Caperta may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana D. Caperta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 100 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 14 |
About Ana D. Caperta
Ana D. Caperta is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Oceanography, having authored 41 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (15 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (10 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (8 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (4 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (611 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (169 citations), Molecular Biology (363 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (59 citations) and Cell Biology (49 citations). Ana D. Caperta has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Wanda Viegas, Andreas Houben, Margarida Delgado, Leonor Morais–Cecílio, Dmitri Demidov, Raheleh Karimi-Ashtiyani, Nuno Neves, Espírito Santo, Pedro García‐Caparrós and Generosa Teixeira. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Botany, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Soil Systems, Taxon and PROTOPLASMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.