Cytogenetic and Genome Research

7.3k papers and 161.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.3k papers published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research in the last decades have received a total of 161.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research usually cover Molecular Biology (4.0k papers), Genetics (3.6k papers) and Plant Science (2.3k papers) specifically the topics of Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2.1k papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1.3k papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (760 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cytogenetic and Genome Research are A Tarkowski, Arthur D. Riggs, Uta Francke, J.L. Hamerton, F Arrighi, F.H. Ruddle, H.P. Klinger, Werner Schmid, T. C. Hsü and Michael Schmid.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

Countries where authors publish in Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cytogenetic and Genome Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025