Amy Speier

514 total citations
15 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Amy Speier is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, General Health Professions and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Speier has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Amy Speier's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism (4 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (4 papers). Amy Speier is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism (4 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (4 papers). Amy Speier collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Amy Speier's co-authors include Andrea Whittaker, Susan Frohlick and Mimí Sheller and has published in prestigious journals such as Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Sociological Research Online and Mobilities.

In The Last Decade

Amy Speier

15 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy Speier United States	8	188	94	76	54	49	15	297
Michal Nahman United Kingdom	10	289 1.5×	136 1.4×	26 0.3×	65 1.2×	54 1.1×	14	380
Soraya Tremayne United Kingdom	9	146 0.8×	88 0.9×	19 0.3×	74 1.4×	65 1.3×	19	246
Gretchen Sisson United States	12	106 0.6×	80 0.9×	86 1.1×	47 0.9×	33 0.7×	22	277
Kimala Price United States	5	73 0.4×	69 0.7×	33 0.4×	50 0.9×	19 0.4×	10	195
Naara Luna Brazil	10	82 0.4×	55 0.6×	37 0.5×	152 2.8×	21 0.4×	39	283
Diane Tober United States	9	131 0.7×	35 0.4×	18 0.2×	44 0.8×	49 1.0×	21	233
Leslie Cannold Australia	8	80 0.4×	40 0.4×	47 0.6×	58 1.1×	36 0.7×	19	198
Fiona Kelly Australia	10	172 0.9×	50 0.5×	11 0.1×	54 1.0×	66 1.3×	41	228
Isabel Karpin Australia	9	110 0.6×	31 0.3×	29 0.4×	28 0.5×	85 1.7×	43	245
Lara Patrício Tavares Portugal	7	44 0.2×	191 2.0×	65 0.9×	214 4.0×	44 0.9×	16	390

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Speier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Speier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Speier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Speier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Speier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Speier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Speier. The network helps show where Amy Speier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Speier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Speier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Speier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Speier. Amy Speier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Speier, Amy, et al.. (2020). Reproductive mobilities. Mobilities. 15(2). 107–119. 17 indexed citations

2.

Speier, Amy. (2020). North American surrogate reproductive mobilities incited by cross-border reproductive care. Mobilities. 15(2). 135–145. 5 indexed citations

3.

Speier, Amy, et al.. (2019). Mobilities Meet Reproductive Vibes . . .. Transfers. 9(1). 95–102. 5 indexed citations

4.

Speier, Amy. (2017). Reproductive Travelers. Anthropology News. 58(1). 1 indexed citations

5.

Speier, Amy. (2017). Fertility Holidays. New York University Press eBooks. 28 indexed citations

6.

Speier, Amy. (2017). Is Information Power? Comparing Anonymous and Open Egg Donation. Sociological Research Online. 22(2). 130–141. 2 indexed citations

7.

Speier, Amy. (2016). Fertility Holidays. New York University Press eBooks. 12 indexed citations

8.

Speier, Amy. (2016). Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 27 indexed citations

9.

Speier, Amy, et al.. (2015). Kinship Travel: Relatedness through International Tourism and Travel Networks. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 57(1). 13–18. 2 indexed citations

10.

Speier, Amy. (2015). Czech Hosts Creating "a Real Home Away from Home" for North American Fertility Travellers. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 57(1). 27–39. 9 indexed citations

11.

Speier, Amy, et al.. (2014). Health and Medicine: Post-socialist Perspectives. Digitalni Knihovna - Knihovna Akademie věd ČR. 50(6). 815–819. 3 indexed citations

12.

Speier, Amy. (2011). Health tourism in a Czech health spa. Anthropology and Medicine. 18(1). 55–66. 37 indexed citations

13.

Speier, Amy. (2011). Brokers, consumers and the internet: how North American consumers navigate their infertility journeys. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 23(5). 592–599. 40 indexed citations

14.

Whittaker, Andrea & Amy Speier. (2010). “Cycling Overseas”: Care, Commodification, and Stratification in Cross-Border Reproductive Travel. Medical Anthropology. 29(4). 363–383. 106 indexed citations

15.

Speier, Amy. (2008). Czech Balneotherapy. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures. 17(2). 145–159. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact