Amy M Mitchell

572 citations
33 papers · 367 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amy M Mitchell

24 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Amy M Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 158
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 51
  • Oncology 22
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 7
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 12
Replace Nicolai Mikkelsen with:
Nicolai Mikkelsen Denmark
LAURA P. COHEN United States
Eugenio Greco Belgium
Shota Uchida Japan
Xiujuan Zhou China
Diogo Silva Piardi Brazil
Ying Ding China
Gonzalo Grazioli Spain
Stephen A. Goldman United States
Robert P. Wielenga Netherlands
Amy M Mitchell relative to Nicolai Mikkelsen Denmark Nicolai Mikkelsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Nicolai Mikkelsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy M Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy M Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy M Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy M Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy M Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy M Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy M Mitchell. The network helps show where Amy M Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy M Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy M Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Amy M Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202289
2 200883
3 202434
4 202131
5 202330
6 202514
7 202213
8 202313
9 202413
10 20238
11 20216
12 20256
13 20245
14 20255
15 20224
16 20223
17 20252
18 20252
19 20201
20 20241

About Amy M Mitchell

Amy M Mitchell is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Gender Studies, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 33 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (21 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (1 paper), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper), Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (158 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (51 citations), Oncology (22 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (7 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (12 citations). Amy M Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Belgium and Canada. Frequent co-authors include André La Gerche, Erin J. Howden, Kristel Janssens, Leah M. Wright, Lawrence Jay Cheskin, Thomas William Lycan, Lisa Davis, Guido Claessen, Stephen Foulkes and Mark J. Haykowsky. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, European Heart Journal, Circulation, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology and European Journal of Applied Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact