Amy J. Scherzer
- Plant Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Soil Science
- Co-authors
- Joanne RebbeckRalph E. J. BoernerJames R. McClenahenSteven M. EshitaKeith DavisKurt W. GottschalkJennifer A. BrinkmanBret W. Butler
- Topics
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers)Plant responses to elevated CO2 (5 papers)Forest ecology and management (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amy J. Scherzer
14 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Plant Science 196
- Global and Planetary Change 156
- Atmospheric Science 126
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 91
- Soil Science 37
Countries citing papers authored by Amy J. Scherzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy J. Scherzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy J. Scherzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy J. Scherzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy J. Scherzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy J. Scherzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy J. Scherzer. The network helps show where Amy J. Scherzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy J. Scherzer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy J. Scherzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy J. Scherzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy J. Scherzer. Amy J. Scherzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sustaining Forests, Sustaining People: The Role of Research [XXIV IUFRO World Congress, 5–11 October 2014, Salt Lake City, USA – Abstracts] | 4 |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | Foliar nutrient concentrations of oak, hickory, and red maple | 2 |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 78 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | Effects of ozone and/or nitrate deposition on the growth and ecophysiology of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) / | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 12 |
About Amy J. Scherzer
Amy J. Scherzer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 14 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (5 papers) and Forest ecology and management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (91 citations), Global and Planetary Change (156 citations) and Atmospheric Science (126 citations). Amy J. Scherzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Rebbeck, Ralph E. J. Boerner, James R. McClenahen, Steven M. Eshita, Keith Davis, Kurt W. Gottschalk, Jennifer A. Brinkman, Bret W. Butler, Renato Prata de Moraes Frasson and Gil Bohrer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Plant Cell & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.