J. H. Galbraith

673 total citations
11 papers, 538 citations indexed

About

J. H. Galbraith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, J. H. Galbraith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 538 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in J. H. Galbraith's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers). J. H. Galbraith is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers). J. H. Galbraith collaborates with scholars based in Australia. J. H. Galbraith's co-authors include Neil C. Turner, Donald White, M. J. Trinick, F. J. Hingston, G. M. Dimmock, F. X. Dunin, D.S. Crombie, G.L. Stoneman, Kim Whitford and J.C. Van Loon and has published in prestigious journals such as New Phytologist, Plant and Soil and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

In The Last Decade

J. H. Galbraith

11 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

J. H. Galbraith

GPC

PS

NLC

AS

SS

Takeshi Toma Japan

Dirk Gries Germany

Anton Grub Switzerland

Gary D. Hogan Canada

Marciel José Ferreira Brazil

Joseph Levillain France

Chelsea Maier Australia

Shiming Tang China

I. S. Paterson United Kingdom

Micheline Colin-Belgrand France

Takeshi Toma Japan

J. H. Galbraith

297 ×1.0

GPC

186 ×0.8

PS

176 ×1.0

NLC

29 ×0.3

AS

53 ×0.6

SS

Citations per year, relative to J. H. Galbraith J. H. Galbraith (= 1×) peers Takeshi Toma

Countries citing papers authored by J. H. Galbraith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. H. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. H. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. H. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. H. Galbraith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. H. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. H. Galbraith. The network helps show where J. H. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. H. Galbraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. H. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. H. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. H. Galbraith. J. H. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

White, Donald, et al.. (2002). Water use by contour-planted belts of trees comprised of four Eucalyptus species. Agricultural Water Management. 53(1-3). 133–152. 77 indexed citations

2.

White, Donald, Neil C. Turner, & J. H. Galbraith. (2000). Leaf water relations and stomatal behavior of four allopatric Eucalyptus species planted in Mediterranean southwestern Australia. Tree Physiology. 20(17). 1157–1165. 165 indexed citations

3.

Hingston, F. J. & J. H. Galbraith. (1998). Application of the process-based model BIOMASS to Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus plantations on ex-farmland in south western Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 106(2-3). 157–168. 23 indexed citations

4.

Hingston, F. J., J. H. Galbraith, & G. M. Dimmock. (1998). Application of the process-based model BIOMASS to Eucalyptus globulus subsp. globulus plantations on ex-farmland in south western Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 106(2-3). 141–156. 51 indexed citations

5.

Stoneman, G.L., D.S. Crombie, Kim Whitford, et al.. (1997). Growth and water relations of Eucalyptus marginata (jarrah) stands in response to thinning and fertilization. Tree Physiology. 17(4). 267–274. 78 indexed citations

6.

Galbraith, J. H. & F. J. Hingston. (1991). Application of a directional dust gauge to measurement of impaction at atmospheric salt. Atmospheric Environment Part A General Topics. 25(10). 2211–2221. 4 indexed citations

7.

Hingston, F. J. & J. H. Galbraith. (1990). Salt impaction at near-coastal locations and possible effects on grapevines in southwest of Western Australia. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 32(3-4). 199–212. 1 indexed citations

8.

Trinick, M. J., et al.. (1983). Competition between fast- and slow-growing tropical legume rhizobia for nodulation ofVigna unguiculata. Plant and Soil. 73(1). 105–115. 18 indexed citations

9.

Trinick, M. J. & J. H. Galbraith. (1980). THE RHIZOBIUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE NON‐LEGUME PARASPONIA IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE CROSS‐INOCULATION GROUP CONCEPT OF LEGUMES. New Phytologist. 86(1). 17–26. 66 indexed citations

10.

Trinick, M. J. & J. H. Galbraith. (1976). Structure of root nodules formed by Rhizobium on the non-legume Trema cannabina var. scabra. Archives of Microbiology. 108(2). 159–166. 25 indexed citations

11.

Loon, J.C. Van, et al.. (1971). The determination of yttrium, europium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium and lutetium in minerals by atomic-absorption spectrophotometry. The Analyst. 96(1138). 47–47. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact