Amy J. Dreves
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Denny J. BruckJana C. LeeVaughn M. WaltonFrank G. ZalomRachael E. GoodhueSally D. O'NealDouglas B. WalshMark Bolda
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers)Insect behavior and control techniques (14 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcologyPlant Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Amy J. Dreves
29 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Insect Science 1.8k
- Plant Science 953
- Ecology 763
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 159
- Molecular Biology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Amy J. Dreves
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy J. Dreves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy J. Dreves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy J. Dreves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy J. Dreves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy J. Dreves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy J. Dreves. The network helps show where Amy J. Dreves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy J. Dreves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy J. Dreves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy J. Dreves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy J. Dreves. Amy J. Dreves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | A detailed guide for testing fruit for the presence of spotted wing Drosophila (SWD) larvae | 6 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 82 | |
| 5 | 2015 Pest Management Guide for Wine Grapes in Oregon | 2 |
| 6 | 117 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 305 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Trapping and identifying mealybugs in Oregon vineyards | 2 |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | Field monitoring for grapevine leafroll virus and mealybug in Pacific Northwest vineyards | 4 |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | Identification of Invasive and Reemerging Pests on Hazelnuts | 3 |
| 20 | 28 |
About Amy J. Dreves
Amy J. Dreves is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (14 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.8k citations), Ecology (763 citations) and Plant Science (953 citations). Amy J. Dreves has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Denny J. Bruck, Jana C. Lee, Vaughn M. Walton, Frank G. Zalom, Rachael E. Goodhue, Sally D. O'Neal, Douglas B. Walsh, Mark Bolda, C. Ioriatti and Peter Baufeld. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Journal of Economic Entomology and Journal of Invertebrate Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.