Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Women or LARC First? Reproductive Autonomy And the Promotion of Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods
2014293 citationsAnu Manchikanti Gómez, Liza Fuentes et al.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Allina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Allina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Allina more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Allina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Allina. The network helps show where Amy Allina may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Allina
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Allina.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Allina based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Allina. Amy Allina is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Allina, Amy, et al.. (2017). Bridging the Divide White Paper: Pregnant Women and Substance Use: Overview of Research & Policy in the United States.9 indexed citations
3.
Allina, Amy, et al.. (2016). Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Overview of Research and Policy in the United States.1 indexed citations
4.
Allina, Amy, et al.. (2016). Bridging the Divide White Paper: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) in the United States.1 indexed citations
Allina, Amy, et al.. (2015). Medication Abortion: Overview of Research & Policy in the United States - References by Topic Area.2 indexed citations
7.
Gómez, Anu Manchikanti, Liza Fuentes, & Amy Allina. (2014). Women or LARC First? Reproductive Autonomy And the Promotion of Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 46(3). 171–175.293 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Allina, Amy. (2002). Orgasms for Sale. Women & Therapy. 24(1-2). 211–218.4 indexed citations
9.
Trussell, James, et al.. (1998). Call 1-888-NOT-2-LATE: promoting emergency contraception in the United States.. PubMed. 53(5 Suppl 2). 247–50.18 indexed citations
Allina, Amy, et al.. (1994). Women's health movements.. PubMed. 24(4). 6–14.4 indexed citations
12.
Allina, Amy, et al.. (1994). The pill without prescription: the international experience..3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.